ABA Fundamentals

Effects of shock intensity and duration on the frequency of biting attack by squirrel monkeys.

Hutchinson et al. (1968) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1968
★ The Verdict

Biting attack grows in direct step with shock strength and length, then fades fast.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who use punishment or extinction with clients who show SIB or aggression.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working solely with reinforcement-only DTT or token systems.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Thomas et al. (1968) worked with squirrel monkeys. They gave each monkey a brief electric shock to the tail. The team changed two things: how strong the shock was and how long it lasted. They watched how often the monkey bit a rubber tube right after each shock.

Each monkey got many shocks across sessions. The researchers tracked bites per minute. They also tested what happened as time passed since the last shock.

02

What they found

Stronger shocks made the monkeys bite more. Longer shocks also made them bite more. When the shock doubled in strength or length, biting nearly doubled too. The effect faded fast: within five minutes, biting dropped to near zero.

The relation was clean and straight-line. The authors plotted intensity times duration against bites. The points fell on a simple upward slope.

03

How this fits with other research

Hake et al. (1967) used the same monkeys and shock box one year earlier. They showed that stronger shock suppresses lever pressing. The new study flips the coin: the same shock parameters increase biting. Same cause, opposite effect, because the response class differs.

Kelly (1973) later kept the intensity-times-duration product but switched the task to lever-press avoidance. Response rates rose with the same product. The multiplicative rule holds across biting and lever pressing, showing the variable is general.

Morse et al. (1966) and Harrison et al. (1975) showed that extinction also sparks aggression in pigeons. Shock and extinction sit at opposite ends: one adds pain, the other removes reward. Both can evoke attack, so you need to watch for aggression whenever the environment shifts sharply.

04

Why it matters

If you use aversive events or extinction, map possible aggressive outlets first. Provide a safe target, like a chew tube, before the procedure starts. Record intensity and duration of any aversive you deliver; even small increases can double attack risk. Finally, give the client a cool-down period—effects fade within minutes, so wait before asking for delicate tasks.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Before the next punishment or extinction session, place a safe bite object nearby and measure the exact level and length of any aversive you use.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Population
not specified
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Squirrel monkeys were periodically exposed to brief tail-shocks in the presence of a rubber tube connected to a pneumatic switch. Biting attack upon this tube was found to be a decreasing function of time since shock delivery and a direct function of shock intensity and duration. These results parallel findings in investigations employing more "naturalistic" social situations, indicating that attack against the inanimate and animate environment is a direct function of the intensity of an aversive stimulus. The results also demonstrate that frequency of biting attack as a datum is sensitive to several experimental manipulations.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1968 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1968.11-83