ABA Fundamentals

Effects of response‐contingent stimulus pairing on vocalizations of nonverbal children with autism

Lepper et al. (2017) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2017
★ The Verdict

Ask for a simple button press before playing speech sounds to spark more vocalizations in nonverbal children with autism.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running early-verbal programs for nonverbal children with autism in clinic or home settings.
✗ Skip if BCBAs focused only on sign language or SGD systems without plans to add vocal targets.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Lepper and team worked with three boys with autism who had no words. The kids heard fun speech sounds like 'ba' or 'da' through a speaker. In one condition the child had to press a button first. In the other condition the sounds played on a fixed schedule no matter what the child did.

The study used an alternating-treatments design. Sessions switched back and forth between the two sound setups. The team counted how many speech-like sounds each boy made during and after the sounds played.

02

What they found

When the child had to press the button first, all three boys made more speech sounds. The extra vocalizations happened right away and kept going after the session ended. The no-response condition did not boost sounds as much.

The button-press rule created a clear cause-and-effect link. That small response requirement turned the speech sounds into stronger rewards for the boys' own voices.

03

How this fits with other research

Miliotis et al. (2012) also used stimulus pairing with nonverbal children with autism. They showed that giving just one sound per trial beats giving three sounds. Lepper et al. (2017) kept the single-sound idea and added the button-press twist. The two studies line up: fewer sounds plus a child action equals more vocal gains.

Li et al. (2025) used the same response-first logic but applied it to toy play instead of speech. Pressing a switch before music played cut stereotypy and raised appropriate play. The matching pattern across studies shows the contingency rule travels well across behaviors.

Gevarter et al. (2016) and Bishop et al. (2020) got more vocalizations by adding brief echoic prompts through a speech device. Lepper's team skipped the device and still saw growth. Both paths work; Lepper offers a low-tech option when tablets are not available.

04

Why it matters

You can add a tiny response requirement to any auditory pairing program today. Have the child tap a card, clap once, or press a switch before you play the target sound. That one-second rule can double the vocal pay-off without extra cost or training. Try it during table time, circle time, or parent coaching sessions and track the child's spontaneous babbles or word attempts.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Place a big red button in front of the child, have him press it, then immediately play a fun speech sound; count new vocalizations for five minutes.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
alternating treatments
Sample size
3
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Research on stimulus-stimulus pairing to induce novel vocalizations in nonverbal children has typically employed response-independent pairing (RIP) procedures to condition speech sounds as reinforcers. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a response-contingent pairing (RCP) procedure on the vocalizations of three nonverbal boys diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. During RCP, adult-delivered sounds that were either paired with a preferred item (target sounds) or not (nontarget sounds) were presented contingent on a button-press response. In Experiment 1, RCP was compared with an RIP procedure, in which the timing of sound presentations was yoked to the preceding RCP session. RCP produced a greater effect on all participants' target vocalizations than RIP. Experiment 2 demonstrated the effects of differential reinforcement of the vocalizations induced in Experiment 1. The results suggest that RCP may develop vocalizations more reliably than RIP procedures.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2017 · doi:10.1002/jaba.415