Effects of operant discrimination training on the vocalizations of nonverbal children with autism.
Operant discrimination training jump-starts speech in nonverbal children with autism and kids like it better than older pairing methods.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team tested two ways to get nonverbal kids with autism to talk.
One way was operant discrimination training (ODT). The other was stimulus-stimulus pairing (SSP).
They switched the two methods back-to-back for each child and counted new vocal sounds.
What they found
ODT made more target sounds than a no-teaching control.
It worked just as well as SSP, but the kids smiled more and fussed less during ODT.
In other words, the children learned to vocalize and liked the method better.
How this fits with other research
Yuan et al. (2023) and Lin et al. (2020) ran similar back-and-forth trials. They also found that starting with the harder, conditional-only format saved time.
DeQuinzio et al. (2018) pushed the idea further. They used discrimination training to teach kids to copy only the right models, not every model.
Goldstein et al. (1991) did the opposite move: parents used simple time delay at home. Both paths raised speech, showing you can reach the same goal by different roads.
Why it matters
If a child is silent, try ODT first. It is quick, needs only a table and tokens, and kids enjoy it. You can always add parent delay later for real-world practice. Start Monday with three clear sounds as targets, reinforce each one, and watch the data climb.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick three consonant-vowel sounds, run 10 ODT trials each session, reinforce with a token and praise, and graph the new vocalizations.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We evaluated the effects of operant discrimination training (ODT) on the vocalizations of 3 boys with autism. We compared ODT to a stimulus-stimulus pairing (SSP) condition and a control condition in an adapted alternating-treatments design. ODT increased the target vocalizations of all participants compared to the control condition, and its effects were similar to SSP. All participants preferred ODT to SSP.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2013 · doi:10.1002/jaba.55