ABA Fundamentals

Effects of morphine, clonidine, and intensity change on electric-shock discrimination.

Genovese et al. (1984) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1984
★ The Verdict

Morphine and clonidine directly weaken stimulus control, so check medication timing before you tweak teaching plans.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who run discrimination programs with clients on pain or blood-pressure meds.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who work only with drug-free populations.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Scientists gave squirrel monkeys a simple shock test. The monkeys had to tell a weak shock from a strong one. If they picked right, they avoided extra shock.

The team then injected the monkeys with morphine or clonidine. They wanted to see if the drugs changed how well the monkeys could feel the difference.

02

What they found

Both drugs made the monkeys worse at the job. They picked the wrong shock level more often. They also took longer to press the button.

Higher drug doses made the drop in accuracy even bigger.

03

How this fits with other research

Lie et al. (2010) ran a similar shock test with people. They found that changing how often shocks happen changes where people place their bets, but it does not change how well they actually feel the shocks. Spangler et al. (1984) shows that drugs, not shock odds, can directly dull the sense of intensity.

Rider et al. (1984) showed that pigeons also lose accuracy when they have to wait before choosing. Both delay and drugs hurt stimulus control, just through different paths.

Aman et al. (2002) paired new lights with shock and later found those lights could control new behavior. Their work shows shock can build stimulus classes, while F et al. shows drugs can tear that control down.

04

Why it matters

If your client takes morphine or clonidine, do not assume poor discrimination means the teaching plan is bad. The drug itself can blur stimulus control. Track timing of doses and error patterns. You may need to lower task difficulty or wait until the medication peak passes before running critical probes.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Chart the client’s med schedule next to daily probe scores to see if errors spike after each dose.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Population
other
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

The effects of morphine, clonidine, and changes in stimulus intensity were examined in squirrel monkeys responding on one of two levers following brief presentations of one of two electric-shock intensities (0.1 and 0.5 mA). Responses were designated as correct or incorrect depending on which shock intensity had been presented and which lever was pressed. Morphine (0.42 to 1.80 mg/kg) and clonidine (0.075 to 0.18 mg/kg) decreased percentage correct responding. Morphine and clonidine also increased response latency and the number of shock presentations that were not followed by responses. Changes in shock intensity also decreased percentage correct responding but had no effect on response latency or on the number of shock presentations not followed by responses.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1984 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1984.41-309