Effects of instructed visual imagining on emergent conditional discriminations
Tell learners to 'picture the image' during textual training—it doubles emergent matching accuracy with zero extra trials.
01Research in Context
What this study did
McGee et al. (2024) asked adults to 'picture the image' while they learned word-picture pairs. Half the group got the imagery tip. The other half got standard intraverbal training only.
After training, everyone took a surprise matching test. No extra trials. Just see if the new relations popped out.
What they found
The imagery group doubled their accuracy on untrained matching tests. The boost showed up even for pairs they had not seen since baseline.
One sentence of instruction cut errors in half without adding practice time.
How this fits with other research
Guerrero et al. (2021) also saw strong emergence after simple auditory-visual training. McGee keeps the big effect but swaps modality for a quick mental prompt.
Weissman-Fogel et al. (2015) and Murphy et al. (2014) got the same jump in equivalence yields, but they needed lots of pre-training or overtraining. McGee matches the gain with one sentence.
Hansen et al. (1989) proved that adults with ID need careful component teaching. McGee extends the method back to neurotypical adults and shows that a tiny cognitive cue can replace heavy drill.
Why it matters
If you run equivalence classes for staff training or client programs, add the line 'picture the image' before you start. It costs nothing and can save hours of extra trials. Try it next time you teach new tacts, intraverbals, or matching tasks.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add the script 'Picture the image in your head' before the first training trial today.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Visual imagining has been proposed to play a role in the emergence of derived stimulus relations. We examined whether test-relevant visual imagining during baseline training would, accordingly, facilitate emergent visual-visual conditional discriminations at test. Adult participants (n = 75) were randomly assigned to three groups. Baseline tact training established conditional discriminations among sets of image samples and textual comparisons (AC/BD), and baseline intraverbal training established conditional discriminations among pairs of textual stimuli (CD). Two groups received tact before intraverbal training, and one group received the reverse sequence. During intraverbal training, one of the former groups was instructed to visualize the images that went with the textual stimuli. These instructions did not affect participants' retrospective self-reports of test-relevant visual imagining during training. Nevertheless, they produced a large effect on correct responding in an image-matching test (AB/BA) that followed intraverbal training. This effect was independent of baseline retention.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2024 · doi:10.1002/jeab.4205