Effects of error and errorless discrimination acquisition on reversal learning.
Start every discrimination program with errorless prompting to avoid stubborn errors later.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers worked with 24 neurotypical kids .
They taught a simple color discrimination task.
Half the kids got errorless training. The other half learned by trial-and-error.
Then everyone had to reverse the rule. Red was now wrong and green was right.
The team counted how many errors each child made during the switch.
What they found
Kids who started with errorless training made far fewer mistakes during reversal.
Graded-choice prompting and clear verbal instructions both beat trial-and-error.
The trial-and-error group kept choosing the old correct color longer.
Errorless learners switched faster and with less frustration.
How this fits with other research
Barlow et al. (1973) showed the same graded-choice trick cuts errors to near zero.
Fantino (1968) proved it works even for kids with severe delays.
Foster et al. (1979) found a twist: once kids learn trial-and-error first, switching to errorless later still hurts learning.
Together these papers warn: start errorless from day one. Trial-and-error leaves a stubborn learning history.
Why it matters
When you teach a new skill, use errorless prompting from the first trial. Fade prompts slowly. Give clear verbal rules. This prevents bad habits that slow down later learning. If a child already has trial-and-error history, expect more errors and plan extra practice.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Replace your first trial-and-error probe with a graded-choice prompt that guarantees success.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The effectiveness of trial-and-error, graded-choice, and verbal-instruction procedures on the acquisition and maintenance of a two-choice simultaneous color discrimination in an intradimensional double-reversal learning situation was studied using 18 first-grade children. After acquiring a red-green discrimination during one 70-trial session, the discriminative roles of the stimuli were reversed for 30 trials, followed by a second reversal for 30 trials. Children in the graded-choice and verbal-instruction groups acquired and maintained the discriminations with fewer errors than children who learned by trial and error. The importance of the results in terms of two-stage discrimination learning theories is pointed out and similarities between errorless learning and overtraining are discussed.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1978 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1978.29-517