ABA Fundamentals

Effects of d-amphetamine and caffeine on schedule-controlled and schedule-induced responding.

McMillan (1979) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1979
★ The Verdict

Caffeine and d-amphetamine quiet both working and extra behavior, and the drop is biggest for the busiest animals.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who run or interpret pharmacology studies with operant baselines.
✗ Skip if Clinicians looking for direct treatment protocols; this is basic science.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team gave rats two common stimulants: caffeine and d-amphetamine.

They watched how the drugs changed lever pressing on a fixed-interval schedule.

They also counted laps of schedule-induced licking, the extra drinking that pops up between food deliveries.

02

What they found

Both drugs slowed the rats down.

Lever pressing dropped, and the compulsive licking almost stopped.

The slowdown was biggest for rats that had been pressing or licking the fastest before the drug.

03

How this fits with other research

Hearst (1960) first showed that d-amphetamine cuts fixed-ratio output; the new study adds fixed-interval and adjunctive behavior to the list.

Sanders (1969) mixed diazepam with the same drug and saw rates go both up and down. The clean drop seen here hints that diazepam, not the amphetamine, drove the messy pattern.

Hymowitz (1981) later found that diazepam boosts punished pressing and licking. Together the three papers draw a simple line: amphetamine suppresses, diazepam restores.

04

Why it matters

If you run drug-behavior studies, remember that baseline speed sets the size of the effect. A hyperactive animal will look calmer after stimulants, while a slow animal may barely change. When you see mixed results across labs, check whether sedatives or anxiety meds were also on board.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Plot each animal’s pre-drug response rate; expect the fastest responders to show the sharpest drop after any stimulant.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

The effects of d-amphetamine and caffeine were studied on rates and patterns of lever pressing and schedule-induced licking under fixed-interval schedules of food pellet presentation. In addition, the effects of caffeine were studied on lever pressing and licking under a multiple fixed-ratio fixed-interval schedule. Caffeine reduced mean overall rates of licking at lower doses than it reduced mean overall rates of pressing under the fixed-interval schedules, but the effects of caffeine on both licking and lever pressing depended largely on the control rate of responding. d-Amphetamine reduced mean overall rates of lever pressing and licking at about the same dose, but the effects of d-amphetamine also were a function of the control rate of responding.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1979 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1979.32-445