ABA Fundamentals

Effects of a motivating operation manipulation on the maintenance of mands.

O'Reilly et al. (2012) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 2012
★ The Verdict

Hold back free reinforcers during mand maintenance probes or you may miss true progress.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing or reviewing mand maintenance programs for children with autism.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only run acquisition phases and never check long-term maintenance.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with children with autism who already had a few mands.

Before each maintenance probe, the kids either got free access to the reinforcer or got none.

Then the researchers checked how many mands the children still used without prompts.

02

What they found

When kids had no free access first, they kept asking for the item later.

If they got the item for free right before the test, their mands dropped.

Free stuff killed the motivation to ask, so the data looked like the skill was gone.

03

How this fits with other research

Valentino et al. (2019) scanned 45 mand studies and saw most teams skip these probes.

O'Reilly et al. (2012) shows why that skip matters: you can get a false negative.

Bowen et al. (2012) tried a different tweak—adding the question "What do you want?"—and saw no change.

Both papers warn small setup choices can hide real skills.

04

Why it matters

Before you write "mand not maintained," run the probe with zero free reinforcer first.

This one switch keeps you from dropping a program that is actually working.

Add it to your checklist next time you review mand goals.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run your next mand maintenance probe after a 15-minute blackout from the reinforcer.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Sample size
3
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

We assessed the maintenance of newly acquired mands under presession reinforcer access (reinforcer efficacy abolished) and no presession reinforcer access (reinforcer efficacy established) conditions with 3 children with autism spectrum disorder. Results suggested that the no presession access condition established the value of the reinforcer and evoked responding relative to the presession access condition. Results are discussed in the context of implications for assessing maintenance of previously acquired skills.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2012 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-443