ABA Fundamentals

Conditioned reinforcement in second-order schedules.

Kelleher (1966) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1966
★ The Verdict

A half-second signal paired with food can drive long work chains if you keep the pairing fresh.

✓ Read this if BCBAs shaping long skill sequences or delay tolerance in clinic or classroom.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only use immediate edible rewards and skip token or praise systems.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Pigeons pecked a key on a second-order schedule. A 0.7-second light flashed each time a fixed-interval part ended. Food arrived only after many parts.

The brief flash was paired with food every time. Researchers asked: can this tiny signal keep the birds working when food is rare?

02

What they found

The short flash worked like a mini-reward. Birds kept pecking and their rate climbed steeply inside each part.

Response stayed strong even though food came only after many flashes. The flash had become a conditioned reinforcer.

03

How this fits with other research

Kodera et al. (1976) later showed the flash only works if you first pair it with food and keep food coming sometimes. Kelleher (1966) proved the idea; L et al. filled in the rules.

Buskist et al. (1988) pushed the idea further. They found a half-second signal keeps pigeons pecking through delays up to 9 seconds. Longer delays need the signal to stay on, not just blink.

Fields et al. (1991) added a twist: d-amphetamine makes the flash even more powerful during extinction. The same brief stimulus grows stronger under drugs.

04

Why it matters

Your praise, a thumbs-up, or a beep on a tablet can act like that flash. Pair it with food, free time, or a toy a few times. Then use it to keep clients working while you stretch the big reward later. Check that the signal stays brief and you still give the real payoff now and then. This keeps conditioned reinforcers alive and strong.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one brief praise word or clicker sound, pair it with a preferred edible five times, then use it to mark correct responses while you slowly space out the real food.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Population
not specified
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Pigeons responded under a schedule in which food was presented only after a fixed number of fixed-interval components were completed. Two such second-order schedules were studied: under one, 30 consecutive 2-min fixed-interval components were required; under the other, 15 consecutive 4-min fixed-interval components were required. Under both schedules, when a 0.7-sec stimulus light was presented at completion of each fixed interval, positively accelerated responding developed in each component. When no stimulus change occurred at completion of each fixed interval, relatively low and constant rates of responding prevailed in each component; a similar result was obtained when a 0.7-sec stimulus change occurred at completion of each fixed interval except the one which terminated with primary reinforcement. The 0.7-sec stimulus correlated with food delivery was an effective conditioned reinforcer in maintaining patterns of responding in fixed-interval components despite low average frequencies of food reinforcement.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1966 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1966.9-475