ABA Fundamentals

Computerized handwriting instruction with severely mentally handicapped adults.

Brewer et al. (1994) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 1994
★ The Verdict

Computer-delivered modeling plus feedback/reinforcement boosts handwriting accuracy in adults with severe ID, but avoid letting them practice too long before introducing the tech.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching daily living or vocational skills to adults with severe intellectual disability in day-hab or residential settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working only with young children or mild learning delays.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers tested a computer program that teaches handwriting to adults with severe intellectual disability. The program showed perfect letter models, gave instant yes/no feedback, and handed out points for accurate copies.

They used a multiple-baseline design across participants. Each adult started the program at a different time so the team could see if gains came from the training, not from something else.

02

What they found

Every adult wrote better letters after the computer lessons. The gains were bigger than what you would expect from just practicing with paper and pencil.

One warning popped out: adults who had already practiced a lot before the study improved less. Too much old-school practice seemed to make the computer help weaker.

03

How this fits with other research

Chang et al. (2014) ran a nearly identical design and also saw success. They taught recycling instead of handwriting, but the same recipe—computer + instant feedback + multiple baseline—worked for adults with ID.

Kanter et al. (2010) looks like a clash at first. Their computer visual-perception training sped up Chinese kids’ handwriting but did not make it neater. The difference is age, skill, and language: kids learning Chinese characters versus adults copying English letters. Same tool, different targets.

Liu et al. (2013) sweep in 26 newer studies and confirm the trend: computer-assisted tech is still the top choice for students with mental disability. The 1994 paper is a small early piece of that bigger picture.

04

Why it matters

If you support adults with severe ID, drop the worksheets and boot up a tablet. Let the computer model, judge, and reward each stroke. Start the tech early—before endless paper practice hardens bad habits. You can build a simple version with free drawing apps and a token board; no fancy lab gear needed.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Load a letter-tracing app, turn on instant sound feedback, and give 3 points for every stroke that hits the line—start today before more paper practice creeps in.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
multiple baseline across participants
Sample size
6
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

The effectiveness of computerized handwriting instruction incorporating modelling of the target letter, corrective feedback and reinforcement contingent upon letter accuracy was examined with severely mentally retarded adults. Assisted by faded prompts on a sheet of paper, subjects wrote the letter 'q' while their handwriting patterns were detected by a digitized graphics tablet linked to a computer. Computerized instruction was introduced for six subjects (mean mental age = 3 years, 10 months) according to a multiple-baseline-across-subjects design. Instruction produced significant improvements in letter quality which were not simply due to the effects of practice. Subjects who had extended practice before being introduced to the computer were less responsive to the information provided by the computer and did not attain the levels of performance accuracy achieved by other subjects.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 1994 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.1994.tb00345.x