Comparison of synchronous reinforcement and accumulated reinforcement for increasing on‐task behavior in preschoolers
Give preschoolers a token the moment they stay on task—waiting kills both performance and kid buy-in.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Seven preschoolers with no diagnoses worked at small tables. The teacher compared two ways to give tokens for on-task behavior.
In one way, the child got a token right when she stayed on task. This is called synchronous reinforcement.
In the other way, tokens piled up and were given later. This is called accumulated reinforcement. The team flipped the two ways across days to see which kept the kids on task longer.
What they found
Every child stayed on task more when tokens came right away. For three kids, the difference was huge.
When asked which way they liked, all seven picked getting tokens right away. No one chose the saved-up way.
How this fits with other research
Diaz de Villegas et al. (2020) ran a similar test and also saw the quick-token win, but the 2024 study added kid choice and clearer numbers. It updates the earlier work.
Leslie et al. (2024) used the same quick-token plan to keep preschoolers wearing masks. The schedule worked again, showing the idea travels to new skills.
Hardesty et al. (2023) found the opposite kid choice: elementary kids liked noncontingent goodies even though quick tokens worked best for work. The clash fades when you see the age gap—little kids like the control, older ones like freebies.
Why it matters
If you run preschool sessions, deliver the reinforcer as soon as the child is on task. Skip saving tokens for later. Kids work harder and will tell you they like it better.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Put a token in the child’s hand within one second of on-task behavior—no delays.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
In synchronous-reinforcement schedules, the duration of behavior directly controls the duration of reinforcement on a moment-to-moment basis. We replicated and extended Diaz de Villegas et al. (2020) by comparing the effects of synchronous reinforcement with two accumulated-reinforcement schedules for increasing on-task behavior for seven preschoolers. One accumulated schedule was the same as the one used in Diaz de Villegas et al. and did not include tokens, whereas the other accumulated schedule included the delivery of tokens within session. Furthermore, we assessed preference for the three reinforcement schedules. The results showed that synchronous reinforcement was effective for increasing on-task behavior for all seven participants. Furthermore, it was most effective for increasing on-task behavior for three out of seven participants and preferred by all participants. For some participants, other schedules were also similarly effective. The results are discussed with respect to implications for application.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2024 · doi:10.1002/jaba.1080