Categorizing a moving target in terms of its speed, direction, or both.
Reinforcement can flexibly steer attention to one stimulus dimension or split it across many.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers showed pigeons short movies of a moving dot on a screen.
The dot varied in two ways: how fast it moved and which way it went.
Food was given only when the birds pecked after the right speed, the right direction, or a mix of both.
The team then watched which part of the movie the birds paid attention to.
What they found
The pigeons quickly shifted their gaze to match the rule that paid off.
When speed earned food, they ignored direction. When direction paid, they ignored speed.
When both mattered, they split attention almost perfectly, like tiny statisticians.
How this fits with other research
Kennedy et al. (1993) first showed that pigeons treat "moving" as a natural category. Luckett et al. (2002) goes deeper: birds can zoom in on single motion parts if you pay them for it.
Vyazovska et al. (2016) added color and shape cues step-by-step. The new study shows you can also pull attention away from unused cues simply by changing the payoff.
Evenhuis (1996) found that stimulus similarity changes choice. Here, the birds show the same idea: they pick the cue that gives the clearest path to food.
Why it matters
Reinforcement alone can teach learners—human or animal—to focus on what matters and ignore what does not. When you write programs, arrange the payoff so the key feature is the only one that pays. If the goal shifts, change the contingency and watch attention move with it.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Put the target feature on extinction while keeping rich reinforcement for the new one—watch attending shift in minutes.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Pigeons categorized a moving target in terms of its speed and direction in an adaptation of the randomization procedure used to study human categorization behavior (Ashby & Maddox, 1998). The target moved according to vectors that were sampled with equal probabilities from two slightly overlapping bivariate normal distributions with the dimensions of speed and direction. On the average, pigeons categorized optimally in that they attended to either speed or direction alone, or divided attention between them, as was required by different reinforcement contingencies. Decision bounds were estimated for individual pigeons for each attentional task. Average slopes and y intercepts of these individually estimated decision bounds closely approximated the corresponding values for optimal decision bounds. There is therefore at least one task in which pigeons, on the average, display flexibility and quantitative precision in allocating attention to speed and direction when they categorize moving targets.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2002 · doi:10.1901/jeab.2002.78-249