Bar press and bar release as avoidance responses.
You can sculpt bar-hold or bar-tap patterns by setting separate press and release shock timers.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team worked with lab rats on a free-operant avoidance box.
Each rat could press or release a bar to stop a shock.
They changed two timers: how long the rat had to keep the bar pressed, and how long it had to stay released.
What they found
Longer press timers made rats hold the bar down more and press less often.
Longer release timers cut both holding time and total presses.
You can dial the schedule to get steady holding or quick tapping.
How this fits with other research
Bloomfield (1967) first showed that lever-hold time tracks the single response-shock interval.
Reberg et al. (1979) split that interval into press and release parts, giving finer control.
Catania et al. (1966) used equal press and release times; the new study shows unequal times shape different topographies.
Staats et al. (2000) later added sleep loss and saw faster tapping; pairing their finding with the 1979 split-interval trick could reveal when fatigue shifts holding to cycling.
Why it matters
If you run avoidance or escape tasks with clients, think about response form, not just rate.
Split the contingencies: require longer holds for calm sitting, shorter holds for quick hand raises.
Test one interval at a time; the 1979 data give you a map for shaping steady vs rapid responses.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one self-protection response and try a 3-s hold requirement before the release is allowed.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Two experiments were performed in which rats had to avoid shock by both pressing and releasing a bar within specified intervals. When the release-shock interval was held constant and the press-shock interval was increased, response rate decreased and bar holding increased. When the press-shock interval was held constant and the release-shock interval was increased, both response rate and bar holding decreased.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1979 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1979.31-373