Awareness training reduces college students' speech disfluencies in public speaking
Awareness training alone can cut college students' public-speaking filler words without booster sessions.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Montes et al. (2019) worked with college students who packed their speeches with um, like, and you know.
The team used awareness training. Students watched their own video, counted disfluencies, and said a cue word when they slipped.
No extra booster sessions. No competing response. Just noticing and counting.
What they found
Every student dropped filler sounds after one training round.
The gains stuck for weeks without extra practice.
How this fits with other research
Montes et al. (2021) later showed the best order: live practice first, then video self-review. This two-step beats either part alone.
Perrin et al. (2024) moved the same idea online. Students still cut disfluencies without a coach in the room.
Laske et al. (2024) add a yardstick: keep fillers under five per minute or listeners tune out.
Why it matters
You can run awareness training in a single class period. Show a short clip, have students tally their own um's, and set a five-per-minute goal. No need for lengthy booster meetings or competing responses. Try it next time you teach public-speaking skills or fluency goals.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Film a 2-minute speech, have the learner count their own um's, and set a five-per-minute ceiling.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Recent research suggests that a modified habit reversal procedure, including awareness training alone or combined with competing response training, is effective in decreasing speech disfluencies for college students. However, these procedures are potentially lengthy, sometimes require additional booster sessions, and could result in covariation of untargeted speaker behavior. We extended prior investigations by evaluating awareness training as a sole intervention while also measuring collateral effects of treatment on untargeted filler words and rate of speech. We found awareness training was effective for all participants without the use of booster sessions, and covariation between targeted filler words and secondary dependent variables was idiosyncratic across participants.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2019 · doi:10.1002/jaba.569