ABA Fundamentals

Awareness training reduces college students' speech disfluencies in public speaking

Montes et al. (2019) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2019
★ The Verdict

Awareness training alone can cut college students' public-speaking filler words without booster sessions.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching public-speaking or fluency to teens and adults
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving clients who need full stuttering programs

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Montes et al. (2019) worked with college students who packed their speeches with um, like, and you know.

The team used awareness training. Students watched their own video, counted disfluencies, and said a cue word when they slipped.

No extra booster sessions. No competing response. Just noticing and counting.

02

What they found

Every student dropped filler sounds after one training round.

The gains stuck for weeks without extra practice.

03

How this fits with other research

Montes et al. (2021) later showed the best order: live practice first, then video self-review. This two-step beats either part alone.

Perrin et al. (2024) moved the same idea online. Students still cut disfluencies without a coach in the room.

Laske et al. (2024) add a yardstick: keep fillers under five per minute or listeners tune out.

04

Why it matters

You can run awareness training in a single class period. Show a short clip, have students tally their own um's, and set a five-per-minute goal. No need for lengthy booster meetings or competing responses. Try it next time you teach public-speaking skills or fluency goals.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Film a 2-minute speech, have the learner count their own um's, and set a five-per-minute ceiling.

02At a glance

Intervention
self management
Design
single case other
Population
neurotypical
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Recent research suggests that a modified habit reversal procedure, including awareness training alone or combined with competing response training, is effective in decreasing speech disfluencies for college students. However, these procedures are potentially lengthy, sometimes require additional booster sessions, and could result in covariation of untargeted speaker behavior. We extended prior investigations by evaluating awareness training as a sole intervention while also measuring collateral effects of treatment on untargeted filler words and rate of speech. We found awareness training was effective for all participants without the use of booster sessions, and covariation between targeted filler words and secondary dependent variables was idiosyncratic across participants.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2019 · doi:10.1002/jaba.569