Autoshaped key pecking maintained by access to a social space.
Social contact can act as a stand-alone reinforcer to create new behavior.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Four pigeons lived in a two-part box. A key light always came on before a wall lifted for 15 s. The birds could then join flock mates in the other side.
The team wanted to know if just seeing the key light would make the birds peck. No food was given. The wall lift was the only reward.
What they found
Every bird started pecking the key after a few pairings. Pecking stayed strong across many sessions.
The result shows that social contact can act as a reinforcer. It also argues against the idea that pecking happens because the key becomes a food cue.
How this fits with other research
Ferster et al. (1968) built the first two-room box for monkeys. Their setup let the 1982 team test social access as a reinforcer.
Najdowski et al. (2003) also worked with pigeons but used food and changing delays. Both studies show that reinforcer type can be swapped while behavior still follows basic operant rules.
Iversen et al. (1984) shaped grooming in monkeys without food. Together these papers tell us that any event the animal wants—food, friends, or grooming—can drive learning.
Why it matters
You now have lab proof that social time can reinforce new responses. In a school or clinic, think beyond snacks and stickers. Let the learner earn a few minutes with a favorite peer, a group game, or a high-five walk. Watch if the target skill grows the same way the pigeons’ pecking did.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one client task and let 2 min of peer time be the only reward for correct responses.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
When four experimentally naive pigeons were exposed to occasional forward pairings of a keylight followed by a doorlight (that signaled access to a large social space), all subjects began to peck the lit key. In a second experiment, where the keylight either preceded the presentation of the doorlight or was presented independently of it, key pecking was maintained only in the former circumstance. The unconditioned stimulus in these experiments--arrival in the social space--did not elicit pecking. Hence, the conditioned response of key pecking and the unconditioned response of entering the social space differed. This demonstration of autoshaping with a social-space unconditioned stimulus argues against a stimulus-substitution account of the findings.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1982 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.38-181