An inexpensive token.
Use foreign coins as cheap, vending-safe tokens that stay in your program.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Wahler (1969) tested a hardware hack. The author wanted a token that felt real but could not buy candy outside the clinic.
The team chose Mexican five-centavo coins. They checked size, weight, and vending-machine fit. The coins worked in homemade token slots but jammed in standard U.S. candy machines.
What they found
The coins passed the clinic test. They were cheap, easy to buy in bulk, and stayed in-program. Staff could hand them out like money without worrying about kids spending them on real treats.
How this fits with other research
Fernandez et al. (2023) show most BCBAs today skip key token-economy steps. They often use stickers or points that have no real feel. Wahler (1969) gives the opposite advice: use something that clinks.
Ivy et al. (2017) found only 19 % of published token studies give full hardware details. The 1969 note fills that gap. It is the missing parts list older reviews left out.
Kaiser et al. (2022) report large gains when tokens are backed by solid reinforcers. Wahler (1969) adds a cheap way to keep tokens from leaking into the real economy.
Why it matters
You can still buy centavos online for a few cents each. Next time you set up a token board, drop real coins in a coffee can. The sound and weight boost conditioned reinforcement, and they won’t work in the hallway vending machine. It’s a fifty-year-old hack that still saves money and keeps your tokens where you want them—in your session.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Order 100 Mexican five-centavo coins online and swap them for your current stickers.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
AN INEXPENSIVE TOKENWhere it is desirable to use a manipulable general- ized reinforcer (as opposed to points, stars, stamps, and so forth), an inexpensive coin is available in the form of the Mexican five-centavo piece.These coins are roughly the same size as the American nickel (Table 1).As such, they are acceptable in National Cash Reg- ister electromechanical coin changers for automatic delivery.They can also be dispensed manually in tube- type coin changers that have nickel-sized columns (e.g., McGill Paragon Changers, Galef Company, New York, New York).Their slightly lighter weight and smaller size, however, makes them unacceptable to standard coin-operated dispensing machines adjusted to accept American nickels, effectively denying an experimental population surreptitious token exchange outside the limits of a given project.These latter devices can gen-
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1969 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1969.2-100