These answers draw in part from “Workshop: Supporting School-Based Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs): Resolving Ethical Dilemmas” by Alex Utley, Ph.D. BCBA (BehaviorLive), and extend it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. Clinical framing, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →The four Core Principles are: (1) Benefit Others, which requires behavior analysts to work toward the benefit of their clients and others while avoiding harm; (2) Treat Others with Compassion, Dignity, and Respect, which guides interpersonal conduct with all stakeholders; (3) Behave with Integrity, which requires honesty, transparency, and adherence to professional and legal standards; and (4) Ensure Their Competence, which requires behavior analysts to maintain and develop their professional knowledge and skills. These principles provide the foundational values that guide ethical decision-making when specific Code provisions do not directly address a situation or when provisions appear to conflict with one another.
The BCBA should first engage in professional dialogue with the administrator, presenting the evidence base for recommended alternatives and explaining the ethical obligation under Code 2.01 to provide effective, evidence-based treatment. If the administrator insists, the BCBA should document their professional recommendation and the rationale for it, seek consultation from colleagues or the BACB ethics resources, and explore whether a compromise can preserve evidence-based core components while addressing the administrator's concerns. If the directive clearly conflicts with client welfare, the BCBA must advocate for the client's interests while documenting all communications and decisions made.
BCBAs should share only information that is directly relevant to the team's decision-making about the student's educational programming. Before sharing behavioral data or clinical observations, consider whether each piece of information is necessary for the team to make informed decisions. Avoid sharing personal family information that is not relevant to educational planning. Ensure that all shared information is handled in compliance with FERPA requirements and district confidentiality policies. If team members request information that the BCBA believes should not be shared, the practitioner should explain their confidentiality obligations and offer to provide the specific information needed for educational decision-making without disclosing unnecessary details.
The resolution process involves several structured steps: First, identify the specific ethical provisions implicated and the parties affected. Second, gather complete information about the situation from all relevant perspectives. Third, consult with trusted colleagues, supervisors, or the BACB ethics resources. Fourth, identify all possible courses of action and evaluate the likely consequences of each for all affected parties. Fifth, select the course of action that best serves the client's interests while maintaining professional integrity. Sixth, implement the decision and document the reasoning process thoroughly. Seventh, follow up to evaluate the outcome and address any unintended consequences. Throughout this process, maintain focus on the Core Principles as the guiding framework.
When caseload demands exceed what can be ethically managed, the BCBA should first document the specific ways in which service quality is compromised, including inadequate assessment time, insufficient supervision, reduced data analysis, or inability to monitor treatment fidelity. Present this documentation to administrators with specific recommendations for caseload adjustments. If administrative changes are not forthcoming, prioritize cases based on clinical need and risk, document the prioritization rationale, and communicate honestly with families and team members about service limitations. Consider whether accepting additional cases would violate Code 2.01 regarding effective treatment or Code 4.06 regarding adequate supervision.
The BCBA should first attempt to address the concern directly with the colleague in a respectful, private conversation, describing the specific behavior observed and the Code provisions implicated. If the colleague is receptive, they may resolve the issue through education and self-correction. If direct communication does not resolve the concern or if the violation poses immediate risk to clients, the BCBA should consult with their supervisor and consider whether formal reporting to the BACB or relevant licensing board is warranted. Throughout this process, maintain documentation of the observed behavior, communications, and steps taken. Code 1.04 requires behavior analysts to address potential ethics violations by others.
Balancing teacher requests with student needs requires viewing teachers as important stakeholders while maintaining the student as the primary client. When a teacher's request aligns with the student's assessed needs, the BCBA should collaborate enthusiastically. When requests conflict with the student's interests, such as requesting punitive consequences for behavior that serves a communicative function, the BCBA should educate the teacher about the behavioral function, offer alternative strategies that address both the teacher's classroom management concerns and the student's needs, and frame recommendations in terms of improving student outcomes. Collaborative relationship-building with teachers is essential for long-term effectiveness.
Multiple resources are available to support ethical decision-making. The BACB maintains an ethics department that can provide guidance on specific dilemmas. State licensing boards may offer ethics consultation services. Professional organizations such as ABAI and state ABA associations often provide ethics-related continuing education and consultation opportunities. Peer consultation groups provide confidential forums for discussing ethical concerns with colleagues who understand the school-based context. Published case studies in behavior-analytic journals offer examples of ethical reasoning applied to real-world situations. Additionally, university training programs may offer ethics consultation to their graduates or local practitioners.
The BCBA should present their recommendations with supporting data and reference to the evidence base, framing suggestions in terms of student outcomes rather than professional preferences. If disagreements persist, the BCBA should listen to the perspectives of other team members, seek to understand their concerns, and explore compromise solutions that preserve the essential elements of effective behavioral intervention. If the team's final decision conflicts with the BCBA's professional judgment, the practitioner should document their recommendation and rationale, consent to implement the team's decision to the best of their ability, and monitor outcomes closely. If the team's decision poses risk to the student, the BCBA must advocate more assertively and document their concerns.
A BCBA has an ethical obligation to refuse to implement directives that clearly violate the Ethics Code or pose risk to clients. However, this refusal should be handled professionally and with documentation. The BCBA should explain the specific ethical concerns to the person issuing the directive, cite the relevant Code provisions, propose alternative approaches that address the underlying goal without ethical compromise, and document the entire exchange. If the conflict cannot be resolved through direct communication, the BCBA should escalate through appropriate channels, which may include district administration, the BACB, or legal counsel. The BCBA should never implement a directive they believe will harm a client simply because it came from an authority figure.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Workshop: Supporting School-Based Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs): Resolving Ethical Dilemmas — Alex Utley · 1.5 BACB Ethics CEUs · $20
Take This Course →We extended these answers with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind the topic, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
279 research articles with practitioner takeaways
258 research articles with practitioner takeaways
252 research articles with practitioner takeaways
1.5 BACB Ethics CEUs · $20 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.