These answers draw in part from “Supporting Equitable Access to Services with Telehealth” by Karen Nohelty, M.Ed., BCBA (BehaviorLive), and extend it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. Clinical framing, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →The most common barriers fall into four categories. Technology barriers include lack of devices, unreliable internet, and unfamiliarity with video platforms. Environmental barriers include lack of private space, noise, and competing demands in the home. Socioeconomic barriers include inflexible work schedules, financial stress, and transportation challenges for hybrid models. Cultural and linguistic barriers include limited English proficiency, cultural attitudes toward technology, and discomfort with home observation. These barriers disproportionately affect low-income families, rural populations, and communities of color, creating disparities in service access and quality.
Behavior analysts should conduct a structured readiness assessment covering technology access, environmental suitability, caregiver availability and comfort, and client characteristics. This assessment should include direct questions about device availability, internet reliability, available space, competing household demands, and the caregiver's comfort level with technology. The client's ability to attend to a screen, need for physical prompting, and the nature of target behaviors should also be evaluated. Based on this assessment, the clinician can determine whether telehealth, in-person, or hybrid services best match the family's circumstances.
Several elements of the BACB Ethics Code (2022) address equity. Code 1.07 requires cultural responsiveness and consideration of diversity in service delivery. Code 2.01 mandates providing effective treatment, which means adapting approaches when standard models do not work for specific populations. Code 2.09 emphasizes involving clients in treatment decisions, including decisions about service delivery format. Code 3.01 broadly requires acting in clients' best interests, which includes advocating for systemic changes that improve access. Together, these codes establish a clear ethical obligation to address inequitable access proactively.
The evidence base for telehealth ABA has grown considerably, and overall outcomes are encouraging. However, effectiveness varies across populations and is influenced by factors such as resource availability, caregiver engagement capacity, and the match between the telehealth format and the client's needs. Families with greater resources tend to show stronger outcomes, not because telehealth is inherently less effective for others, but because standard telehealth models assume resource levels that not all families possess. When barriers are systematically identified and addressed, telehealth can be effective across diverse populations.
Organizations should invest in infrastructure that supports equity, including technology lending programs for devices and mobile hotspots, interpreter and translation services, flexible scheduling templates that accommodate diverse work schedules, training for clinicians on barrier assessment and culturally responsive practice, and community partnerships that provide access points for families without home-based resources. Organizations should also collect and analyze data on access barriers and outcomes disaggregated by demographic factors to identify systemic patterns and direct resources where they are most needed.
Clinicians can adapt by using lower-bandwidth platforms or audio-only options when video is unreliable, scheduling sessions during times when internet demand is lower, providing asynchronous components such as video models or written instructions that families can access on their own schedule, reducing session length to accommodate data limitations, training caregivers on procedures through phone-based coaching when video is unavailable, and coordinating with community resources such as libraries or community centers that offer free internet access. The key is flexibility and creativity rather than a rigid adherence to a single format.
Cultural factors influence telehealth in multiple ways. Some families may view technology-mediated services as impersonal or insufficient compared to in-person care. Others may be uncomfortable with a provider observing their home environment via video. Language barriers can make video-based instruction more difficult to follow. Cultural attitudes toward disability, help-seeking, and the role of professionals vary across communities and affect engagement. Behavior analysts should approach these factors with curiosity and respect, asking families about their preferences and adapting their approach accordingly rather than assuming a universal comfort level with telehealth.
Clinicians and organizations should track session attendance and cancellation rates by demographic group, frequency and duration of technology-related disruptions, caregiver implementation fidelity across populations, client progress rates compared across demographic factors, caregiver satisfaction and reported barriers, and time from referral to service initiation. Disaggregating these metrics reveals whether certain populations are experiencing systematically worse access or outcomes. When disparities are identified, they should prompt investigation and targeted intervention to address the underlying barriers.
A transition to in-person services should be considered when technology or environmental barriers consistently prevent effective session delivery, when the client requires physical prompting or hands-on support that cannot be delivered through a caregiver, when caregiver stress or competing demands make active participation in telehealth untenable, when client progress has plateaued and access barriers are a likely contributing factor, or when the family expresses a clear preference for in-person services. The decision should be collaborative, involving the family in weighing the benefits and limitations of each format given their specific circumstances.
Informed consent for telehealth should go beyond standard disclosure to include a clear explanation of what telehealth involves, including technology requirements and the role the caregiver will play. It should address potential limitations such as connectivity issues, reduced ability to provide physical prompting, and privacy considerations. Families should be informed about alternatives, including in-person or hybrid options, and about their right to change the service delivery format at any time. Consent discussions should be conducted in the family's preferred language and should assess comprehension rather than simply obtaining a signature, consistent with Code 2.06.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Supporting Equitable Access to Services with Telehealth — Karen Nohelty · 1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $19.99
Take This Course →We extended these answers with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind the topic, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
225 research articles with practitioner takeaways
194 research articles with practitioner takeaways
187 research articles with practitioner takeaways
1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $19.99 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.