These answers draw in part from “Shaping the Future of Behavior Analytic Services: Teaching Ethical Decision-Making in Supervision Experiences” by Crystal Harms, MEd, BCBA (BehaviorLive), and extend it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. Clinical framing, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →While the specific steps are detailed in Crystal Harms' presentation, ethical decision-making models typically include steps such as identifying the ethical issue, gathering relevant facts, consulting the Ethics Code and relevant laws, identifying affected stakeholders and their perspectives, generating multiple possible courses of action, evaluating each option against ethical principles and practical constraints, consulting with colleagues or ethics resources, selecting a course of action, implementing the decision, documenting the process and rationale, and evaluating the outcome to inform future decision-making. The systematic nature of the process ensures that decisions are deliberate, principled, and defensible rather than reactive or intuitive.
Knowledge of the Ethics Code is necessary but not sufficient for ethical practice. The Code provides principles and standards that define professional expectations, but it cannot anticipate every situation a practitioner will encounter. Many real-world ethical situations involve ambiguity, competing obligations, and contextual factors that require judgment beyond what the Code's text provides. Teaching ethical decision-making builds the analytical skills needed to apply Code principles to novel, complex situations. It develops the practitioner's ability to identify ethical dimensions of clinical situations, reason through competing considerations, and arrive at principled decisions even when the right answer is not obvious.
Common barriers include limited supervision time that is often consumed by clinical and administrative priorities, supervisor discomfort with ambiguous ethical situations that do not have clear answers, supervisee reluctance to discuss ethical concerns due to fear of judgment or negative career consequences, organizational cultures that do not prioritize ethics education, lack of training for supervisors in how to teach ethical reasoning, the perception that ethical situations are rare rather than everyday occurrences, and the challenge of creating realistic ethical scenarios for practice. Addressing these barriers requires intentional prioritization of ethics within supervision and organizational support for ethics education.
Creating a safe environment for ethical discussion requires several practices. Supervisors should explicitly communicate that raising ethical concerns is valued and expected. They should respond to ethical questions with curiosity and analysis rather than judgment. They should normalize the difficulty of ethical situations by sharing their own experiences with ethical dilemmas, including situations where they were uncertain. They should ensure that supervisees face no negative consequences for raising concerns about organizational practices, supervisor behavior, or their own ethical challenges. They should use hypothetical scenarios to practice ethical reasoning in a low-stakes context before addressing real situations. Over time, these practices build trust that enables honest, productive ethical discussions.
Disagreement is a healthy and valuable part of ethical reasoning. When a supervisee disagrees with the supervisor's analysis, the supervisor should welcome the disagreement, ask the supervisee to explain their reasoning, consider whether the supervisee's analysis has merit, and model how to work through competing perspectives to reach a well-reasoned conclusion. If the disagreement involves a situation where the supervisor believes the supervisee's proposed course of action would be harmful or unethical, the supervisor should explain their reasoning clearly and, if necessary, exercise their supervisory authority to ensure client welfare is protected. However, shutting down disagreement without engaging with the supervisee's reasoning undermines the learning process.
Organizational culture significantly shapes supervisees' ethical behavior. When organizations prioritize client welfare, encourage ethical discussion, support reporting of concerns, and hold practitioners accountable for ethical practice, supervisees develop in an environment that reinforces ethical behavior. When organizations prioritize productivity over quality, discourage reporting, or create cultures of fear around ethical issues, supervisees learn that ethical concerns are unwelcome, which can lead to silence, cynicism, or complicity with unethical practices. Supervisors should help supervisees understand how organizational culture affects ethical practice and develop strategies for maintaining ethical standards even in challenging organizational environments.
While the 11-step process is presented as a comprehensive framework, experienced practitioners learn to move through the steps efficiently. For situations that require immediate action, the practitioner can prioritize the most critical steps: identify the ethical issue, consult the Ethics Code for relevant principles, consider the immediate impact on client welfare, select the course of action that best protects the client, and act. More thorough analysis can occur afterward, informing future decision-making. The goal of teaching the full process during supervision is to build the analytical habits that allow practitioners to make principled decisions quickly when necessary, not to suggest that every decision requires extended deliberation.
The most effective training scenarios are realistic, relevant to the supervisee's practice setting, and appropriately complex. Good scenarios involve competing ethical obligations rather than clear-cut right and wrong answers. They should include contextual factors such as organizational pressures, cultural dimensions, and interpersonal dynamics that complicate decision-making. Scenarios should progress in complexity over time, starting with more straightforward situations and advancing to situations with multiple stakeholders, ambiguous information, and no clearly correct course of action. Using scenarios based on real situations, with identifying details removed, is particularly effective because it demonstrates that ethical dilemmas are a routine part of practice rather than rare exceptions.
Supervisors model ethical decision-making by making their own ethical reasoning transparent. When facing an ethical situation, the supervisor can walk the supervisee through their thought process in real time or discuss it afterward. This includes identifying the ethical dimensions of the situation, consulting the Ethics Code, considering stakeholder perspectives, evaluating options, and explaining the rationale for the chosen course of action. Supervisors should also model how to handle uncertainty, seek consultation, acknowledge mistakes, and take corrective action. The supervisor's behavior in their own practice is the most powerful teaching tool available, because supervisees learn as much from what they observe as from what they are told.
Reviewing the Ethics Code during supervision builds knowledge of the Code's content, which is necessary but not sufficient. This course's approach goes further by teaching a process for applying the Code to real-world situations. The difference is analogous to the difference between memorizing behavioral principles and being able to apply them in clinical practice. The 11-step decision-making process, scenario-based practice, and integration of contextual factors develop the analytical skills that transform Code knowledge into ethical competence. Additionally, this approach addresses the emotional and interpersonal dimensions of ethical decision-making, such as managing anxiety, navigating disagreements, and maintaining professional boundaries, which are not addressed by Code review alone.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Shaping the Future of Behavior Analytic Services: Teaching Ethical Decision-Making in Supervision Experiences — Crystal Harms · 1.5 BACB Ethics CEUs · $20
Take This Course →We extended these answers with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind the topic, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
279 research articles with practitioner takeaways
256 research articles with practitioner takeaways
252 research articles with practitioner takeaways
1.5 BACB Ethics CEUs · $20 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.