These answers draw in part from “Mentorship Advice for Behavior Analysts” (The Daily BA), and extend it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. Clinical framing, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →Supervision is a formal, BACB-regulated relationship tied to fieldwork hours and certification requirements, with specific content expectations and documentation obligations. Mentorship is a broader developmental relationship that is not tied to certification or regulatory requirements — it addresses professional growth, career navigation, and the informal knowledge that formal training does not cover. Supervision has a defined scope and end point (completion of fieldwork hours); mentorship can extend across an entire career. A supervisor may also be a mentor, but many of the most valuable mentorship relationships occur outside of formal supervisory structures.
Deliberate mentorship-seeking is more effective than waiting for a mentorship relationship to emerge spontaneously. Start by identifying practitioners whose clinical work, research, or career trajectories reflect the competencies or trajectory you are pursuing. Professional associations like ABAI and APBA offer formal mentorship programs. State ABA organization listservs and social media communities (e.g., Facebook groups, LinkedIn) provide access to a broader practitioner network. When approaching a potential mentor, be specific about what you are working on and what you are hoping to learn — this makes it easier for the potential mentor to assess whether they can genuinely help and to structure early conversations productively.
Early meetings should establish the relationship's purpose, structure, and expectations. Share your self-assessment of current strengths and development areas. Ask the mentor about their areas of expertise and the mentoring approach they typically use. Agree on meeting frequency, format, and what you will bring to each meeting. Clarify what the mentor expects from you in terms of preparation and follow-through. Some mentors prefer a highly structured approach with explicit goals and progress tracking; others work more conversationally. Understanding this early prevents misalignment about what the relationship is supposed to produce and how it will operate.
Preparation is the primary variable that distinguishes mentees who get the most from mentorship from those who get little. Arrive with specific questions, clinical dilemmas, or professional challenges rather than waiting for the mentor to direct the conversation. Bring case examples when discussing clinical topics — concrete material produces more useful guidance than abstract questions. After each meeting, write down the two or three most important things you learned and the specific actions you will take before the next meeting. Report back on those actions at the beginning of the following session. This creates accountability and demonstrates to the mentor that their investment is producing behavioral change.
Yes — the mosaic mentorship model explicitly recommends building a network of mentors who serve different functions rather than relying on a single relationship. Different mentors can provide expertise in different clinical domains, different perspectives on career navigation, different types of professional support, and access to different networks. The risk of multiple simultaneous mentors is confusion when they offer conflicting advice; the solution is to be clear with yourself about what each mentor is being asked to address and to use your own judgment when advice diverges rather than deferring entirely to any single source.
Unproductive relationships are characterized by consistently comfortable conversations that do not challenge your thinking, a pattern of the mentor solving your problems rather than building your capacity to solve them, or a felt obligation to maintain the relationship socially that is not matched by meaningful professional growth. Potentially harmful relationships involve the mentor exploiting the mentee's time or work for the mentor's own benefit, the mentor providing guidance in areas outside their competence, or the mentor discouraging the mentee from seeking other professional relationships or perspectives. Either type warrants reconsidering whether to restructure or conclude the relationship.
Readiness to mentor is not primarily determined by years of experience or certification level — it is determined by whether you have genuine expertise in the domain you are being asked to mentor, whether you can distinguish between your own experiences (which may not generalize) and principles that are likely to apply to the mentee's situation, and whether you can tolerate the ambiguity of supporting someone's development without controlling the direction of that development. Many early-career BCBAs are ready to offer peer mentorship to RBTs or BCaBAs earlier than they realize. The key is to be transparent about the boundaries of your knowledge and to actively refer when questions exceed your expertise.
Professional identity — the practitioner's sense of who they are as a behavior analyst and what they stand for — develops through exposure to a range of professional perspectives, clinical experiences, and relationships with practitioners who embody different expressions of the science. Mentors who are willing to share their own professional journey, including the doubts, pivots, and hard lessons, provide a more complete model of what professional development actually looks like than is available from formal training alone. When mentees observe mentors navigating complexity with integrity, they develop templates for their own professional conduct that carry forward into independent practice.
Section 1.05 requires behavior analysts to practice within their areas of competence — this extends to mentoring, meaning mentors should not offer guidance in areas where they lack genuine expertise. Section 1.11 addresses multiple relationships and the exploitation of professional relationships, which is relevant when mentorship relationships overlap with employment, research collaboration, or personal relationships. Section 2.01 requires competent service delivery, and mentors who provide guidance that meaningfully shapes a mentee's clinical practice bear some responsibility for ensuring that guidance is accurate and ethically sound.
Geographic distance reduces the incidental contact opportunities that help informal mentorship relationships form and maintain naturally, so distant mentorship requires more deliberate scheduling and structuring. Video calls provide richer communication than email or text. Regular scheduled check-ins — even brief ones — are more effective than episodic contacts that happen only when one party has an urgent question. Asynchronous options like sharing written case conceptualizations or draft clinical documents for mentor feedback can supplement synchronous calls. The key is establishing a regular rhythm of contact before the relationship becomes defined primarily by crisis consultation, which tends to narrow the scope of what the mentorship covers.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Mentorship Advice for Behavior Analysts — The Daily BA · 1 BACB Supervision CEUs · $24.99
Take This Course →We extended these answers with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind the topic, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
194 research articles with practitioner takeaways
174 research articles with practitioner takeaways
106 research articles with practitioner takeaways
1 BACB Supervision CEUs · $24.99 · The Daily BA
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.