These answers draw in part from “Learning to Use Essential for Living” by Patrick McGreevy, Ph.D, BCBA-D Author of the Essential for Living Curriculum (BehaviorLive), and extend it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. Clinical framing, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →Essential for Living is specifically designed for individuals with limited skill repertoires and moderate-to-severe problem behavior, whereas ABLLS-R and VB-MAPP were primarily designed for early learners. EFL focuses on functional skills that have the greatest impact on quality of life and safety rather than following a developmental sequence. It prioritizes communication methods that will work for a lifetime across all settings and partners. EFL also uses a task analysis approach that measures small increments of progress, making it more sensitive to the gains made by individuals who learn slowly. For older individuals with significant disabilities, EFL provides more appropriate goals and a more relevant organizational framework than tools designed for young children beginning ABA services.
The Essential Eight Skills represent the core competencies that most directly impact quality of life and safety for individuals with limited repertoires. They include requesting preferred items and activities, rejecting non-preferred items and activities, requesting a break, following essential safety instructions, tolerating situations that cannot be changed immediately, waiting, transitioning between activities, and participating in daily routines. These skills are prioritized because reliable performance in these areas dramatically changes an individual's daily experience, reduces the motivation for many forms of problem behavior, and enables greater participation in community activities. Mastery of these foundational skills creates the conditions necessary for learning additional skills.
The initial quick assessment surveys the individual's functional abilities across essential skill domains through a combination of direct observation, caregiver and staff interview, and brief probe trials. It is designed to be completed efficiently without requiring extended assessment sessions that may not be feasible for individuals with significant problem behavior. The assessment identifies the individual's current functional level in each domain, highlights areas of strength that can be built upon, and identifies the most pressing skill deficits that should be addressed first. The results directly inform priority setting and program development, giving the clinician actionable information to begin intervention planning promptly.
A lifetime communication method is one that meets several criteria: it can be understood by unfamiliar communication partners, not just trained staff; it works across all settings including community environments; the individual can use it independently without prompting; it can be expanded as the individual's repertoire grows; and it is durable enough to remain functional as the individual ages and their living situation changes. Many individuals with limited repertoires have been taught communication systems that work in clinical settings but fail in natural environments. EFL pushes clinicians to evaluate communication systems against these lifetime criteria and to invest in building communication that will serve the individual across their entire lifespan, not just during the years they receive active ABA services.
EFL addresses problem behavior primarily through the teaching of functional skills, particularly communication. When individuals cannot effectively request what they want, reject what they do not want, or request a break from demands, problem behavior often serves these communicative functions. By building reliable communication skills, EFL removes the primary motivation for many forms of challenging behavior. Additionally, teaching tolerance, waiting, and transition skills directly addresses the antecedent conditions that commonly occasion problem behavior. This skill-building approach is complementary to traditional behavior support plans and often reduces the need for restrictive interventions by addressing the skill deficits that underlie problem behavior.
While EFL was designed with a particular focus on adolescents and adults with significant disabilities who are underserved by early learner curricula, it can also be used with children who have limited skill repertoires and moderate-to-severe problem behavior. The key criterion is not age but the individual's functional level. A child with severe intellectual disability and very limited communication may benefit from EFL even at a young age if their repertoire is more aligned with EFL's scope than with early learner tools. The assessment helps determine whether EFL is appropriate by evaluating the individual's current functional level regardless of chronological age.
EFL's task analysis framework breaks skills into small, sequential components that allow clinicians to document incremental progress. Rather than measuring whether an individual has mastered a complete skill, the assessment records advancement through individual steps within the skill sequence. This sensitivity to small gains is essential for maintaining accurate progress documentation, motivating staff and families, and making data-based decisions about instructional modifications. BCBAs should communicate progress in terms of both the specific skill components being mastered and their functional significance, helping stakeholders understand what each gain means for the individual's daily life rather than presenting abstract data without context.
While discrete trial training typically involves structured teaching sessions with massed trials in controlled settings, EFL emphasizes teaching within natural contexts during naturally occurring routines. Skills are taught in the environments where they will be used, during the activities where they naturally occur, and with the materials and people the individual will actually encounter. This contextual approach promotes generalization from the beginning of instruction rather than teaching in isolation and hoping for transfer. Staff must learn to identify and create teaching opportunities within daily routines, which requires a different skill set than running structured trial sessions. Both approaches have their place, but EFL's emphasis on natural context is designed to produce functional, generalized skills.
Direct care staff need training in several areas to implement EFL effectively. First, they need to understand the rationale behind the Essential Eight Skills and why specific targets were selected for the individual they serve. Second, they need procedural training on how to create and capitalize on teaching opportunities within daily routines rather than relying on scheduled therapy sessions. Third, they need training on the individual's communication system, including how to prompt, reinforce, and fade support for communication responses. Fourth, they need data collection training specific to EFL's incremental recording system. Behavioral skills training, including instruction, modeling, rehearsal, and feedback, is the recommended approach for building these staff competencies.
Generalization is built into the EFL framework rather than treated as a separate phase of instruction. Skills are taught in the natural contexts where they will be used from the beginning, which promotes generalization across settings, people, and materials as part of the initial teaching process. The assessment does not consider a skill mastered when it is performed only in a training context. Instead, mastery criteria require demonstration across natural environments, with multiple people, and under varying conditions. This built-in generalization criterion ensures that programming produces skills that improve daily functioning rather than creating splinter skills that exist only in controlled settings. When generalization does not occur naturally, the clinician systematically programs for it by varying teaching conditions.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Learning to Use Essential for Living — Patrick McGreevy · 4 BACB Ethics CEUs · $98
Take This Course →We extended these answers with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind the topic, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
280 research articles with practitioner takeaways
279 research articles with practitioner takeaways
258 research articles with practitioner takeaways
4 BACB Ethics CEUs · $98 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.