By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
Disciplinary centrism is the unconscious belief that your own professional discipline is superior to or more important than other disciplines. It manifests as dismissing other professionals' recommendations, using jargon to assert expertise, dominating team meetings, or assuming that behavioral approaches should take precedence over other interventions. Disciplinary centrism damages interprofessional relationships, reduces the quality of collaborative care, and ultimately harms clients by preventing the integration of diverse professional perspectives.
Cultural competence implies achieving a defined level of knowledge and skill regarding specific cultural groups, suggesting an endpoint that can be reached. Cultural humility, in contrast, is an ongoing process of self-reflection, openness, and willingness to learn that acknowledges you can never fully understand another person's or group's experience. Applied to interprofessional practice, cultural humility means maintaining an orientation of curiosity and respect toward other disciplines rather than claiming to fully understand or evaluate them. It is a stance you maintain, not a destination you arrive at.
Not at all. Cultural humility and advocacy for evidence-based practice are compatible. Cultural humility means presenting your evidence and perspective respectfully, acknowledging that other disciplines also have evidence bases and valid perspectives, and being open to the possibility that your initial recommendation may not be the best approach for every situation. You can advocate strongly for evidence-based behavioral approaches while simultaneously respecting the expertise that other professionals bring to the team.
Address the concern directly and professionally. Share the evidence supporting your concern, including specific data or research. Frame the discussion around client welfare rather than disciplinary superiority. Ask the other professional to explain the rationale for their recommendation. If you cannot resolve the disagreement through direct discussion, involve a supervisor or administrator. Document the situation and your concerns. Your primary obligation is to the client, and this obligation may require you to assert your professional judgment, but always with respect for the other professional.
SLPs and behavior analysts share many clients and have overlapping areas of expertise, particularly around communication. Learn the basics of SLP assessment and intervention methods. Understand the distinction between speech, language, and communication from the SLP perspective. Collaborate on communication goals, ensuring that behavioral and speech-language approaches are coordinated rather than competing. Attend SLP professional development events or read introductory materials. Most importantly, approach SLP colleagues as partners with complementary expertise rather than as competitors for the communication domain.
The key is explaining concepts in terms of their practical meaning rather than their technical definitions. Instead of saying 'differential reinforcement of alternative behavior,' say 'we will redirect the student to an appropriate way to get what they need and provide positive attention when they use it.' Practice translating your most commonly used terms into plain language. Ask colleagues from other disciplines if your explanations are clear. Remember that jargon is a barrier to communication, not a marker of expertise, and that clear communication serves your clients better than technical vocabulary.
Yes. Cultural humility does not mean diminishing your expertise or being passive in interprofessional settings. It means holding your expertise with openness rather than rigidity. You can be confident in your behavioral knowledge and skills while also being genuinely curious about what other disciplines offer. Professional confidence combined with cultural humility creates a practitioner who advocates effectively for their perspective while remaining open to influence from others. This combination is more persuasive and more effective than confidence alone.
Warning signs include: one discipline consistently dominating team discussions, other professionals disengaging or withholding input, recommendations being made without considering other disciplines' perspectives, jargon being used without translation, team members expressing frustration about not being heard, conflicting recommendations being given to families without resolution, and interprofessional meetings being experienced as adversarial rather than collaborative. If you observe these patterns, disciplinary centrism may be a contributing factor.
Clients with complex needs are served by multiple professionals, and the coordination of those services directly affects outcomes. Effective collaboration produces comprehensive assessments that draw on multiple perspectives, coherent intervention plans that integrate rather than contradict each other, consistent implementation across providers and settings, and a unified team presentation that builds family confidence and engagement. Research consistently shows that coordinated, team-based care produces better outcomes than fragmented individual services.
Cultural humility does not require you to abandon your professional identity. You are a behavior analyst, and your training in behavioral principles, functional assessment, and data-based decision-making is valuable and distinctive. Cultural humility asks you to hold your professional identity alongside rather than above the professional identities of your colleagues. You can be proudly and competently a behavior analyst while also being respectful of and curious about what other disciplines contribute. The strongest professional identity is one that is secure enough to engage with different perspectives without feeling threatened.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: An Exercise in Cultural Humility — Trina Spencer · 3 BACB Ethics CEUs · $60
Take This Course →3 BACB Ethics CEUs · $60 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.