These answers draw in part from “Fostering Acceptance and Inclusion in Applied Behavior Analysis: Centering Intersectionality and Embracing Diversity” by Shelby Dorsey, PhD, BCBA (BehaviorLive), and extend it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. Clinical framing, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →Intersectionality is a framework for understanding how multiple identity dimensions, such as race, disability, gender, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status, interact to shape an individual's experiences and opportunities. It is relevant to ABA because clients and practitioners hold multiple identities that influence behavioral presentations, treatment preferences, and service outcomes. A behavior analyst who considers only one dimension of a client's identity, such as their disability status, while ignoring others, such as their race or cultural background, may miss critical contextual variables that affect the assessment, goal selection, and intervention design.
The BACB Ethics Code (2022, Code 1.07) requires behavior analysts to actively evaluate the degree to which their cultural variables interact with those of their clients and to adapt their practices accordingly. This is not a passive requirement; it calls for ongoing professional development, self-reflection, and practice modification. Code 1.10 further requires awareness of personal biases, and Code 2.01 establishes that effective treatment must account for the client's cultural context. Together, these provisions create an ethical framework that positions cultural responsiveness as a core competency rather than an optional enhancement.
Common barriers include lack of representation in leadership and training faculty, graduate curricula that do not reflect diverse perspectives, workplace cultures that privilege certain communication styles or neurotypes, financial barriers to certification and continuing education, microaggressions and implicit biases in professional interactions, limited mentorship opportunities for practitioners from underrepresented backgrounds, and organizational policies that do not accommodate diverse needs. These barriers operate at systemic and institutional levels, meaning that addressing them requires organizational change rather than solely individual effort.
Start by examining your assessment tools and protocols for cultural assumptions. Consider whether the norms and criteria you use are validated for your client's cultural and linguistic background. Include culturally relevant questions in your intake process, such as questions about family values, cultural practices, and the meaning of specific behaviors within the client's cultural context. Seek input from the family about their priorities and concerns, and be willing to modify your assessment approach based on their feedback. When possible, use interpreters or cultural brokers to ensure clear communication. Approach each assessment with cultural humility, recognizing that your own cultural perspective is one of many valid frameworks.
Cultural competence traditionally refers to acquiring knowledge about different cultural groups and developing skills for cross-cultural interaction. While valuable, this approach can imply that one can become fully competent in another person's culture, which risks oversimplification and stereotyping. Cultural humility, in contrast, is an ongoing process of self-reflection and learning that recognizes the limits of one's own cultural knowledge. It emphasizes curiosity, openness, and respect for each client's unique cultural experience rather than the acquisition of generalized cultural facts. Cultural humility positions the practitioner as a lifelong learner who partners with clients to understand their cultural context.
Organizations can take several concrete steps. First, audit current demographics at all levels and identify representation gaps. Second, revise recruitment and hiring practices to actively reach diverse candidate pools. Third, incorporate DEI content into all training programs rather than treating it as a separate initiative. Fourth, create mentorship and professional development pathways for employees from underrepresented backgrounds. Fifth, establish feedback mechanisms that allow employees and clients to raise DEI concerns safely. Sixth, review compensation and promotion practices for equity. Seventh, engage with diverse community stakeholders when designing services and programs. Systemic change requires sustained effort and organizational commitment, not one-time training events.
Addressing implicit bias begins with acknowledging that everyone has biases shaped by their cultural background, experiences, and social environment. Formal tools such as implicit association tests can help identify specific biases, though they should be used as starting points for reflection rather than definitive assessments. Ongoing self-reflection, journaling, and supervision that includes discussion of cultural dynamics are valuable practices. Seeking feedback from colleagues from diverse backgrounds can reveal blind spots. Reading broadly about the experiences of marginalized groups helps build awareness. Most importantly, create accountability structures that check your clinical decision-making for bias, such as peer review of assessment reports and treatment plans.
This situation requires careful navigation that respects both the family's cultural values and the behavior analyst's professional obligation to provide effective treatment. Start by seeking to understand the family's perspective deeply, not just superficially. Often, what appears to be a conflict between cultural values and evidence-based practice is actually a conflict between the behavior analyst's assumptions about the family's values and the family's actual priorities. Genuine dialogue may reveal shared goals that can be pursued through culturally adapted methods. When genuine conflicts exist, prioritize the family's autonomy while clearly communicating your clinical perspective and the evidence supporting your recommendations. Document the discussion and the family's informed decision.
Autistic self-advocates have been instrumental in pushing ABA to examine its practices, values, and impacts from the perspective of the people it serves. Their contributions include challenging practices that prioritize compliance over autonomy, advocating for assent-based approaches, highlighting the importance of neurodiversity-affirming goals, and sharing lived experiences that reveal the emotional impact of ABA interventions. Behavior analysts should engage with autistic self-advocacy perspectives as essential input for improving practice, not as adversarial criticism to be dismissed. This engagement can take the form of reading autistic-authored publications, inviting autistic consultants to organizational discussions, and centering autistic voices in research and program design.
Social validity requires that treatment goals be meaningful and appropriate within the client's specific cultural context. To ensure this, involve the family and, when appropriate, the client in goal development from the outset. Ask about the family's priorities, values, and vision for their child's future. Assess whether proposed goals reflect the social norms and expectations of the client's cultural community, not just the behavior analyst's professional assumptions. Regularly revisit goals with the family to ensure they remain relevant and valued. When goals address social skills, ensure that the target behaviors are functional within the specific social environments the client navigates, which may include culturally specific settings such as religious communities, extended family gatherings, or culturally distinct peer groups.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Fostering Acceptance and Inclusion in Applied Behavior Analysis: Centering Intersectionality and Embracing Diversity — Shelby Dorsey · 1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $20
Take This Course →We extended these answers with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind the topic, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
279 research articles with practitioner takeaways
258 research articles with practitioner takeaways
252 research articles with practitioner takeaways
1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $20 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.