By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Clinical decision guide
One of the most consequential decisions a behavior analyst makes is not just what intervention to use, but how to approach the clinical question in the first place. For welcome to my life: how to increase client participation and autonomy in their own care and programing across the school, residential, and adult day habilitation settings, the difference between an evidence-based, individualized approach and a traditional, protocol-driven one can significantly impact outcomes.
This guide lays out the key factors side by side to support your clinical decision-making.
| Factor | Evidence-Based Approach | Traditional Approach |
|---|---|---|
| When appropriate | When the client has the communication abilities and self-awareness to identify meaningful goals, when increasing autonomy and self-determination is a treatment priority, and when the client's expressed preferences align with their overall wellbeing — client-directed goal selection maximizes social validity and motivation | When safety concerns require specific skill targets regardless of client preference, when the client's current abilities limit their capacity to evaluate goal options, or when prerequisite skills must be established before client-preferred goals can be meaningfully pursued |
| Assessment approach | Preference assessment, structured interviews, choice-making procedures, and direct conversation with the client to identify goals that are meaningful from their perspective — supplemented by clinical assessment to ensure goals are achievable and measurable | Standardized assessment tools, developmental norms, curriculum-based assessment, and clinical judgment to identify skill deficits and behavioral excesses — supplemented by stakeholder input to ensure goals are socially valid |
| Ethical basis | BACB Ethics Code provisions for client involvement (Code 2.09), client rights (Code 4.07), and social validity — emphasizing the individual's right to shape their own treatment and the empirical evidence that client participation improves outcomes | BACB Ethics Code provisions for effective treatment (Code 2.01), evidence-based practice, and professional competence — emphasizing the behavior analyst's responsibility to ensure that goals address genuine needs and are achievable through behavioral intervention |
| Client involvement | The client is the primary decision-maker for goal selection, with the behavior analyst serving as a guide who helps translate preferences into measurable goals and ensures feasibility — the power dynamic favors client autonomy | The behavior analyst is the primary decision-maker, with client and family input incorporated as one factor among several — the power dynamic favors clinical expertise |
| Outcome measurement | Outcomes measured against client-defined success criteria, including satisfaction with progress, perceived relevance of goals, and self-reported quality of life improvements — alongside traditional behavioral measures of skill acquisition and behavior change | Outcomes measured against clinician-defined mastery criteria, standardized assessment benchmarks, and objective behavioral data — with social validity assessed as a secondary measure |
| Risk if wrong | Client-selected goals may not address critical safety or health needs, may focus on preferred activities at the expense of foundational skills, or may reflect limited awareness of available options rather than genuine informed choice — these risks can be mitigated by supplementing client input with clinical assessment | Clinician-selected goals may lack social validity, may target skills the client does not value, may reflect professional assumptions rather than individual needs, and may produce compliance without genuine engagement — these risks can be mitigated by systematically incorporating client preferences |
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Use this framework when approaching welcome to my life: how to increase client participation and autonomy in their own care and programing across the school, residential, and adult day habilitation settings in your practice:
Does the data support a need for intervention? Is there a meaningful impact on the individual's quality of life, safety, or access to reinforcement?
YES → Proceed to assessment NO → Document reasoning, monitor
A functional assessment should guide intervention selection. Avoid defaulting to standard protocols without individual analysis. Consider environmental variables, setting events, and private events.
YES → Select evidence-based approach matched to function NO → Complete assessment first
Goals should be co-developed. Assent and informed consent are ethical requirements. The individual's preferences and values matter in selecting both goals and methods.
YES → Proceed with collaborative plan NO → Engage in shared decision-making
This course covers the clinical and ethical dimensions in detail with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Workshop: Welcome to My Life: How to increase client participation and autonomy in their own care and programing across the school, residential, and adult day habilitation settings — Jenna Gilder · 3 BACB Ethics CEUs · $80
Take This Course →3 BACB Ethics CEUs · $80 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide
Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.