This comparison draws in part from “Turn-taking” (ABA Courses), and extends it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. The decision framework, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →Behavior analysts selecting instructional formats for turn-taking must choose between more structured, therapist-directed approaches like discrete trial training (DTT) and more flexible, learner-directed approaches like naturalistic environment teaching (NET). Both formats have behavioral foundations and empirical support, but they differ meaningfully in how they arrange antecedents, manage motivating operations, and promote generalization. DTT offers experimental control, clear data systems, and rapid skill acquisition under controlled conditions. NET leverages natural reinforcers and social contexts to produce skills that emerge in the situations where they are most needed. For turn-taking specifically, these tradeoffs are especially salient because the skill is inherently social and dyadic — it only has meaning in natural interaction. Practitioners must understand the strengths and limitations of each format to make informed programming decisions for individual learners. The comparison below examines six key dimensions to help guide that decision-making process.
| Factor | Evidence-Based Approach | Traditional Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Motivating Operations | DTT: MOs may be artificially arranged (controlled access to preferred item), which ensures motivation but may not reflect natural motivation levels | NET: MOs emerge naturally from the learner's in-the-moment interests, producing turn-taking under conditions that better approximate real social contexts |
| Stimulus Control & Cue Naturalness | DTT: Cues are standardized and consistent, supporting rapid acquisition but requiring deliberate transfer to more natural social signals | NET: Cues are varied and naturally occurring, which may slow initial acquisition but produces stronger stimulus generalization from the start |
| Data Collection Feasibility | DTT: Structured format allows precise step-by-step data collection, making it easy to monitor prompt level, accuracy, and latency per trial | NET: Data collection is more challenging in fluid interactions; requires well-designed event recording tools and trained observers |
| Generalization of Skills | DTT: Skills acquired in DTT may not spontaneously generalize; explicit generalization programming with multiple partners and settings is required | NET: Skills trained in natural contexts with varied partners tend to show stronger generalization, though acquisition may be less efficient initially |
| Caregiver Implementation | DTT: Requires training on discrete trial procedure, consistent prompt delivery, and data recording — may be difficult for caregivers to implement with fidelity at home | NET: More closely resembles natural play interactions, making it more intuitive for caregivers to embed into daily routines with brief parent training |
| Learner Preference & Engagement | DTT: Some learners engage well with structured, predictable formats, but others show escape behavior or low motivation in repetitive instructional sessions | NET: Learner choice and preferred activities embedded in instruction typically maintain higher engagement, especially for learners who find DTT aversive |
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Use this framework when approaching turn-taking in your practice:
Does the data support a need for intervention? Is there a meaningful impact on the individual's quality of life, safety, or access to reinforcement?
YES → Proceed to assessment NO → Document reasoning, monitor
A functional assessment should guide intervention selection. Avoid defaulting to standard protocols without individual analysis. Consider environmental variables, setting events, and private events.
YES → Select evidence-based approach matched to function NO → Complete assessment first
Goals should be co-developed. Assent and informed consent are ethical requirements. The individual's preferences and values matter in selecting both goals and methods.
YES → Proceed with collaborative plan NO → Engage in shared decision-making
This course covers the clinical and ethical dimensions in detail with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Turn-taking — ABA Courses · 1 BACB General CEUs · $0
Take This Course →We extended this decision guide with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind each approach, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
279 research articles with practitioner takeaways
195 research articles with practitioner takeaways
183 research articles with practitioner takeaways
1 BACB General CEUs · $0 · ABA Courses
Research-backed educational guide
Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.