This comparison draws in part from “Survey Results of Clinicians' Training, Beliefs, and Use of Assessments and Behavior-Reduction Procedures during Treatment of Problem Behavior” by Kathryn Glodowski, PhD, BCBA-D (BehaviorLive), and extends it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. The decision framework, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →One of the most consequential decisions a behavior analyst makes is not just what intervention to use, but how to approach the clinical question in the first place. For survey results of clinicians' training, beliefs, and use of assessments and behavior-reduction procedures during treatment of problem behavior, the difference between an evidence-based, individualized approach and a traditional, protocol-driven one can significantly impact outcomes.
This guide lays out the key factors side by side to support your clinical decision-making.
| Factor | Evidence-Based Approach | Traditional Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of Function Identification | Indirect/Descriptive: Moderate accuracy; informant report may be influenced by recall bias, and descriptive data shows correlation but not causation between variables and behavior. | Experimental Functional Analysis: Highest accuracy; systematic manipulation establishes causal relationships, producing the most reliable basis for function-based treatment selection. |
| Time and Resource Requirements | Indirect/Descriptive: Lower requirements; can be completed within typical clinical schedules using standard interview and observation procedures. | Experimental Functional Analysis: Higher requirements; traditional methods require controlled environments and dedicated sessions, though practical functional analysis methods have reduced these demands. |
| Safety Considerations | Indirect/Descriptive: No evocation of problem behavior during assessment; information is gathered through report and observation without deliberately creating conditions that may occasion challenging behavior. | Experimental Functional Analysis: Involves deliberate evocation of problem behavior, which requires safety planning, trained personnel, and may be contraindicated for certain behaviors or populations. |
| Treatment Outcome Prediction | Indirect/Descriptive: Treatments based on indirect assessment alone have lower probability of success; may lead to multiple treatment revisions before effective intervention is identified. | Experimental Functional Analysis: Treatments matched to experimentally confirmed function have significantly higher probability of success, often producing rapid and durable behavior change. |
| Applicability Across Settings | Indirect/Descriptive: Highly applicable across settings; can be conducted in homes, schools, clinics, and community settings with minimal environmental requirements. | Experimental Functional Analysis: Traditionally limited to controlled settings, though practical functional analysis methods have expanded applicability to naturalistic environments. |
| Training Requirements for Competent Implementation | Indirect/Descriptive: Moderate training requirements; structured interview and observation protocols can be learned relatively quickly with appropriate supervision. | Experimental Functional Analysis: Substantial training requirements; competent implementation requires understanding of experimental design, data interpretation, and safety management. |
| Ethical Defensibility | Indirect/Descriptive: May be ethically questionable as a sole assessment when experimental functional analysis is feasible, given the evidence for superior treatment outcomes with function-confirmed interventions. | Experimental Functional Analysis: Strongly ethically defensible when conducted competently; aligns with the obligation to use the most effective assessment to inform the most effective treatment. |
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Use this framework when approaching survey results of clinicians' training, beliefs, and use of assessments and behavior-reduction procedures during treatment of problem behavior in your practice:
Does the data support a need for intervention? Is there a meaningful impact on the individual's quality of life, safety, or access to reinforcement?
YES → Proceed to assessment NO → Document reasoning, monitor
A functional assessment should guide intervention selection. Avoid defaulting to standard protocols without individual analysis. Consider environmental variables, setting events, and private events.
YES → Select evidence-based approach matched to function NO → Complete assessment first
Goals should be co-developed. Assent and informed consent are ethical requirements. The individual's preferences and values matter in selecting both goals and methods.
YES → Proceed with collaborative plan NO → Engage in shared decision-making
This course covers the clinical and ethical dimensions in detail with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Survey Results of Clinicians' Training, Beliefs, and Use of Assessments and Behavior-Reduction Procedures during Treatment of Problem Behavior — Kathryn Glodowski · 1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $19.99
Take This Course →We extended this decision guide with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind each approach, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
280 research articles with practitioner takeaways
279 research articles with practitioner takeaways
252 research articles with practitioner takeaways
1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $19.99 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide
Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.