This comparison draws in part from “Radical Strategy” by Portia James, M.A., BCBA (BehaviorLive), and extends it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. The decision framework, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →One of the most consequential decisions a behavior analyst makes is not just what intervention to use, but how to approach the clinical question in the first place. For radical strategy, the difference between an evidence-based, individualized approach and a traditional, protocol-driven one can significantly impact outcomes.
This guide lays out the key factors side by side to support your clinical decision-making.
| Factor | Evidence-Based Approach | Traditional Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Decision-making driver | Reactive Operations: Immediate demands, available opportunities, and individual leader judgment | Radical Strategy: Explicit strategic criteria applied consistently against documented organizational objectives |
| Resource allocation | Reactive Operations: Allocated in response to immediate needs; vulnerable to shortsighted tradeoffs | Radical Strategy: Allocated according to strategic priorities with explicit criteria for competing demands |
| Organizational resilience | Reactive Operations: Fragile; single points of failure are common and unaddressed | Radical Strategy: Deliberately built through redundancy planning and distributed competency |
| Staff engagement | Reactive Operations: Strategy is not shared; staff lack context for understanding leadership decisions | Radical Strategy: Strategic objectives are operationalized at every role level; staff understand how their work connects to direction |
| Performance measurement | Reactive Operations: Lagging indicators after problems emerge; corrective-focused | Radical Strategy: Leading indicators monitored prospectively; adjustment happens before problems reach crisis level |
| Scalability | Reactive Operations: Scales poorly; quality and consistency degrade as complexity increases | Radical Strategy: Designed for scale; systems produce consistent behavior independent of individual leader presence |
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Use this framework when approaching radical strategy in your practice:
Does the data support a need for intervention? Is there a meaningful impact on the individual's quality of life, safety, or access to reinforcement?
YES → Proceed to assessment NO → Document reasoning, monitor
A functional assessment should guide intervention selection. Avoid defaulting to standard protocols without individual analysis. Consider environmental variables, setting events, and private events.
YES → Select evidence-based approach matched to function NO → Complete assessment first
Goals should be co-developed. Assent and informed consent are ethical requirements. The individual's preferences and values matter in selecting both goals and methods.
YES → Proceed with collaborative plan NO → Engage in shared decision-making
This course covers the clinical and ethical dimensions in detail with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Radical Strategy — Portia James · 1 BACB Supervision CEUs · $50
Take This Course →We extended this decision guide with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind each approach, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
280 research articles with practitioner takeaways
258 research articles with practitioner takeaways
212 research articles with practitioner takeaways
1 BACB Supervision CEUs · $50 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide
Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.