This comparison draws in part from “Ditching the Tyranny of 'Or' and Embracing the Power of 'And': Ethical Considerations” by Robbie El Fattal, Ph.D., BCBA-D (BehaviorLive), and extends it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. The decision framework, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →One of the most consequential decisions a behavior analyst makes is not just what intervention to use, but how to approach the clinical question in the first place. For ditching the tyranny of 'or' and embracing the power of 'and': ethical considerations, the difference between an evidence-based, individualized approach and a traditional, protocol-driven one can significantly impact outcomes.
This guide lays out the key factors side by side to support your clinical decision-making.
| Factor | Evidence-Based Approach | Traditional Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Decision-Making Authority | Clinical-Only Focus: Clinical leaders make service delivery decisions independently. Operational constraints are treated as problems for the business side to solve. Financial sustainability may be neglected. | Integrated Excellence: Clinical and operational leaders collaborate on decisions that affect service delivery. Clinical quality metrics and financial metrics are reviewed together. Both perspectives inform every major decision. |
| Staff Retention Strategy | Clinical-Only Focus: Retention efforts focus on clinical mentorship and professional development opportunities. Compensation and scheduling may not be competitive because these are seen as operational concerns. | Integrated Excellence: Retention strategy addresses both professional fulfillment and practical needs. Competitive compensation, flexible scheduling, career pathways, and meaningful clinical work are all recognized as retention variables. |
| Training Investment | Clinical-Only Focus: Training emphasizes clinical skills but may not account for implementation feasibility or scalability. Training programs may be resource-intensive in ways that are not sustainable. | Integrated Excellence: Training is designed to be both clinically rigorous and operationally efficient. Competency-based approaches ensure quality while structured curricula allow consistent delivery across locations. |
| Quality Metrics | Clinical-Only Focus: Quality measured exclusively through clinical indicators such as client progress, treatment fidelity, and assessment scores. Operational health indicators are not tracked or not linked to quality discussions. | Integrated Excellence: Quality measured through clinical outcomes alongside staff retention, caseload sustainability, training effectiveness, and family satisfaction. All metrics viewed as interconnected indicators of organizational health. |
| Growth Strategy | Clinical-Only Focus: Growth resisted or unplanned because it is viewed as threatening quality. New locations or expanded caseloads are seen as diluting clinical culture. Organization may struggle with financial sustainability. | Integrated Excellence: Growth planned with clinical quality safeguards built in. Expansion contingent on workforce readiness, training capacity, and supervision infrastructure. Growth serves both mission and margin. |
| Stakeholder Engagement | Clinical-Only Focus: Clinical staff drive quality conversations. Executive and operational staff are viewed as outsiders to the clinical mission. Siloed communication perpetuates misunderstanding. | Integrated Excellence: All stakeholders, from RBTs to executive leadership, are engaged in quality conversations with clear roles. Operational staff understand clinical priorities. Clinical staff understand business realities. |
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Use this framework when approaching ditching the tyranny of 'or' and embracing the power of 'and': ethical considerations in your practice:
Does the data support a need for intervention? Is there a meaningful impact on the individual's quality of life, safety, or access to reinforcement?
YES → Proceed to assessment NO → Document reasoning, monitor
A functional assessment should guide intervention selection. Avoid defaulting to standard protocols without individual analysis. Consider environmental variables, setting events, and private events.
YES → Select evidence-based approach matched to function NO → Complete assessment first
Goals should be co-developed. Assent and informed consent are ethical requirements. The individual's preferences and values matter in selecting both goals and methods.
YES → Proceed with collaborative plan NO → Engage in shared decision-making
This course covers the clinical and ethical dimensions in detail with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Ditching the Tyranny of 'Or' and Embracing the Power of 'And': Ethical Considerations — Robbie El Fattal · 1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $20
Take This Course →We extended this decision guide with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind each approach, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
279 research articles with practitioner takeaways
232 research articles with practitioner takeaways
225 research articles with practitioner takeaways
1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $20 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide
Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.