Role clarity, perception of the organization and burnout amongst support workers in residential homes for people with intellectual disability: a comparison between a National Health Service trust and a charitable company.
Charity-run ID residential homes protect staff from emotional exhaustion better than NHS trust homes.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team handed a short survey to support workers in two types of homes for adults with intellectual disability. One group worked for a National Health Service trust. The other group worked for a charity company.
Workers answered questions about role clarity, how they saw the organization, and burnout. The goal was to see if the type of employer changed how staff felt.
What they found
Charity staff reported much lower emotional exhaustion than NHS trust staff. They also spoke more positively about the organization. Role clarity was high in both groups, so the difference was not about knowing the job.
In plain words, charity-run homes were easier on staff feelings.
How this fits with other research
Finke et al. (2017) asked the same burnout questions in UK community teams and found high exhaustion. The 1998 study found low exhaustion in charity homes. The two results look opposite, but the settings differ: residential versus community. Community teams juggle travel and scattered cases, so stress rises even under a charity badge.
Moliner et al. (2017) built on the 1998 finding by showing that lower staff burnout later predicts higher family satisfaction. The charity edge is not just nicer for staff; families feel the benefit too.
Barron et al. (2011) scoping review warned that some private out-of-area homes underperform. The 1998 survey reminds us that not-for-profit status can still win on staff well-being.
Why it matters
If you contract or refer residential placements, weigh the employer type. Charity homes may keep staff fresher, which trickles down to client care and family happiness. Push for contracts that fund strong organizational support, and ask potential providers for recent staff burnout data before you sign.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add one question about staff turnover or burnout to your next provider checklist.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Changes in roles and responsibilities brought about by community care and the reorganization of the UK National Health Service (NHS) have resulted in higher levels of stress and insecurity amongst residential nursing staff working with people with intellectual disability. In the light of these organizational changes, questions have arisen about the relationship between role clarity, perception of the organization and occupational stress. A number of studies have investigated these issues amongst staff working with people with intellectual disability, although there have been few investigations in the UK. The present study examines the relationship between these variables in the context of the differences between the employees of an NHS trust and a charitable organization. The present study involved constructing a measure of role clarity and perception of the organization, and the use of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). The results indicated that most support workers regarded their role as being clear and their levels of burnout to be comparable with UK nursing norms. Charity staff were more likely to view their organization positively and rated their emotional exhaustion as significantly lower than NHS trust staff. A within-service comparison of homes revealed differences amongst NHS trust and charity homes on sub-scales of the MBI. The results are discussed in the context of previous research and changes in working practices in the field.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 1998 · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00150.x