Prevention of developmental disabilities: a model for organizing clinical activities.
A 1987 clinic blueprint for preventing developmental disabilities still powers modern agency systems and parent coaching models.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Timberlake et al. (1987) drew a five-part map for preventing developmental disabilities. The map shows how doctors, teachers, and behavior analysts can share the same road instead of driving alone.
The paper is a think-piece, not an experiment. It tells clinics how to line up staff, money, and data so kids get help before problems grow.
What they found
The team did not test kids or count behaviors. They built a blueprint: pick a leader, train staff, track data, teach families, and keep all teams talking.
Clinics that follow the blueprint should catch delays earlier and cut later costs, but the paper gives no numbers.
How this fits with other research
Townsend et al. (2024) later showed the blueprint can work. Across six ABA agencies and ten years, the same five ideas—clear roles, staff training, data loops—kept quality high and parents happy.
Provenzi et al. (2021) moved the map into the home. Their ABCD parent framework keeps the 1987 spirit but puts families, not clinics, in the driver’s seat.
Bao et al. (2017) widened the road again. They took the 1987 clinic model and stretched it to whole-state policy, adding outcome dashboards for every agency.
Why it matters
You can lift the 1987 five parts today: name a team leader, write a staff-training calendar, pick one data sheet, add parent classes, and set a monthly meeting. Start small—one room, one kid—and let the system grow. The later papers prove the frame still stands, whether you run a clinic, a school, or a home program.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one data sheet, one staff trainer, and one parent class—schedule all three on the same calendar this week.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Prevention of developmental disabilities receives widespread support, however, a comprehensive approach involving federal and local governments, major professional groups, and the general public has yet to be defined and implemented. Three major issues appear to impede a coordinated approach: (a) prevention's image problem; (b) the complexity surrounding prevention efforts; and (c) the absence of consistent evaluation methods. The University of California, Irvine-University Affiliated Program has developed a model for prevention activities in response to these issues. This model is interdisciplinary, promotes reasoned cooperative efforts, and provides a basis for evaluation and research. This paradigm can be helpful to policy makers in prioritizing prevention activities. The model is composed of five major and functional approaches to prevention with a central core devoted to ethical considerations. The model emphasizes the variety, scope and interdisciplinary nature of prevention/intervention activities, as well as the necessity for a longitudinal approach.
Research in developmental disabilities, 1987 · doi:10.1016/0891-4222(87)90051-5