Service Delivery

Prediction of residential independence of special education high school students.

Heal et al. (1994) · Research in developmental disabilities 1994
★ The Verdict

Student problem behavior and competence, not just IQ, predict who will live on their own after special-education exit.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing transition plans for high-school students in special-education programs.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only serve elementary-age clients or focus on academic tutoring.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team looked at special-education high-school leavers. They wanted to know which facts foretell who will live on their own later.

They fed missing data, student problem behavior, student skills, and family facts into a regression model. The model tried to guess who would achieve residential independence.

02

What they found

The model explained 44 percent of the variance in residential independence. Problem behavior, missing records, student competence, and family traits all mattered.

Fewer behavior problems and stronger competence raised the odds of living independently. Family support also helped.

03

How this fits with other research

Corrigan et al. (1998) ran almost the same study with more predictors. They got 37.6 percent variance explained, close to the 44 percent here. The pattern held: daily living skills, social skills, and low problem behavior still won.

McGeown et al. (2013) followed teens further into full adult life. They also found that adolescent challenging behavior beat IQ and autistic traits when predicting later functioning. The message is steady: behavior counts most.

Kahn (1992) looked at younger kids with severe ID. Early adaptive scores forecast later scores four years out. Together, these papers say: measure behavior and adaptive skills early, keep tracking, and plan supports around them.

04

Why it matters

BCBAs can start rating problem behavior and adaptive skills before exit. Use the data to flag who needs extra living-skills teaching, family training, or behavior reduction. Targeting these areas now may lift the chance of true residential independence later.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a brief adaptive-living and problem-behavior checklist to each transition plan and set one related goal this week.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
2686
Population
mixed clinical
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The residential independence of post-secondary students was assessed for the 2,686 interviewees of the National Longitudinal Transition Study who had left United States high schools between 1985 and the time of the questionnaire in 1987. An index of residential placement independence was the dependent variable in a regression analysis that featured 37 community, family, student, and school program characteristics entered as block-wise predictors (i.e., entered in a controlled order). Results showed a total R2 of .443, with missing data, student maladaptive ("problem") behavior, student competence, and family characteristics all contributing significantly to the prediction of post-school residential independence.

Research in developmental disabilities, 1994 · doi:10.1016/0891-4222(94)90013-2