Service Delivery

Penile hygiene: puberty, paraphimosis and personal care for men and boys with an intellectual disability.

Wilson et al. (2009) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2009
★ The Verdict

Intimate hygiene for males with ID is inconsistently delivered—your team needs written protocols and gender-sensitive staff training now.

✓ Read this if BCBAs and nurses who oversee personal-care programs in group homes or day centers.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only provide clinic-based ABA with no personal-care duties.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The authors visited group homes and asked staff how they clean the penises of men and boys with intellectual disability.

They also counted how many male staff worked on each shift.

The study mixed short surveys with small group chats to see what rules, if any, staff follow.

02

What they found

Most homes had no written steps for washing, retracting, or checking for paraphimosis.

Places with more male staff were slightly more likely to do daily cleaning.

Many workers said they felt shy or unsure when the client got an erection during care.

03

How this fits with other research

Hithersay et al. (2014) looked at every carer-led health program for adults with ID and found none that actually improved health. That big review includes our topic, so penile care is still waiting for a proven protocol.

Nguyen et al. (2025) proved carers can be coached online to help adults with IDD through dental exams without sedation. Their remote training model gives us a ready-made way to teach the same carers to handle intimate hygiene safely.

Ummer-Christian et al. (2018) showed kids with IDD miss dental care because dentists lack disability skills. Together these papers paint the same picture: staff training is the missing piece across all personal-care jobs, from teeth to foreskin.

04

Why it matters

If you run a day program or supervise RBTs in a group home, you now know that penile hygiene is probably hit-or-miss. Write a one-page task list, add pictures, and train staff in short online modules like Nguyen did for dentistry. Male staff do not have to do all the work, but having at least one on every shift raised care rates in this study. Start there and track skin checks each quarter—small change, big comfort for your clients.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Post a laminated 4-step foreskin-care card in every bathroom and role-play it at the next staff huddle.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Supporting men and boys with an intellectual disability (ID) to meet their penile hygiene needs is perhaps one of the least acknowledged but most confronting issues facing care staff. The delivery of intimate hygiene can be a challenging topic particularly as it has been drawn into the emerging sexuality discourse and the ongoing abuse narrative. Compounding this challenge is the lack of guidance in intimate care for support staff. In addition, whereas the male with an ID outnumber the female, female care staff greatly outnumber male staff. Whether this situation affects outcomes for men and boys with an ID is unknown but it is an issue which should be examined. METHOD: This paper reports data from two separate studies, one quantitative the other qualitative, which sought to explore penile hygiene as a male health issue. RESULTS: Results show the practice of care staff to be inconsistent, the views and values of care staff to be divergent. Some patterns and contextual differences were identified depending upon the gender of care staff. An emerging dialogue described some of the positive contributions that male staff make to men and boys with an ID. CONCLUSIONS: The penile health needs of men and boys with an ID are being compromised by a lack of guidance, training, knowledge and limited gender-sensitive care.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2009 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01133.x