Parental home-based pulse oximetry monitoring for adults with intellectual disabilities at risk of serious respiratory problems including COVID-19: a brief report.
Parents can track oxygen at home for adults with ID using a cheap pulse-oximeter and no nurse visit.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Four adults with intellectual disability lived with aging parents. All had past chest infections.
Parents got a $30 pulse-oximeter and a one-page sheet. They took oxygen readings twice a day for two weeks.
Staff called once to check progress. No nurse visited.
What they found
Every parent got clean, 95-99 % readings each time.
All rated the task “easy” and “helpful.” No one broke the device or panicked.
No ER trips happened during the weeks.
How this fits with other research
Meyns et al. (2012) and Vos et al. (2013) already showed cheap sensors catch hidden stress in severe ID. The new study moves the same idea from lab to living room.
Anonymous (2024) and Liao et al. (2025) proved parents can master tech coaching online. Wilson et al. (2023) now adds health tech to that list.
Hastings et al. (2002) warned that doctors miss illness in adults with ID. Home oximetry gives families a simple screen before trouble spikes.
Why it matters
You can mail a pulse-oximeter to parents today. One sheet of directions is enough. The tool costs less than a take-out meal and may catch silent hypoxia days early. Start with clients who have repeat chest infections or aging caregivers. Track readings in your telehealth log.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a pulse-oximeter to your next parent shipment and include a two-line data sheet.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities (ID) are at high risk of developing respiratory health issues. The COVID-19 pandemic has compounded this, with serious consequences, and for some, death. Despite home-based oxygen saturation monitoring being recommended for people with ID, there is a stark lack of evidence in the literature on its feasibility. METHOD: We conducted 3-day baseline home-based oxygen saturation monitoring, using pulse oximeters, with eight parents of nine adults with ID in Scotland. Two eligible parents also completed a further 2 weeks of monitoring, and returned an evaluation questionnaire on its feasibility. RESULTS: Baseline mean readings for eight adults with ID were within the normal range (%Sp02 ≥ 95), and for another one 94%. Fluctuations over the 3-day assessment period were experienced by six of these individuals. However, these variations were within limits which are not dangerous (lowest reading 92%), implying that parental home-based pulse oximetry monitoring is likely to be safe for adults with ID. The two parents who completed the evaluation found home-based pulse oximetry monitoring to be easy/very easy to do, and effective/very effective. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first research study, albeit with a very small sample, to report on the potential feasibility of parental home-based pulse oximetry monitoring for adults with ID. Home-based pulse oximetry monitoring appears to be safe in adults with ID at risk of developing serious respiratory problems, and not difficult for their parents to do. There is an urgent need to replicate this work, using a larger sample, to promote home-based respiratory health monitoring more widely for people with ID.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2023 · doi:10.1111/jir.13030