How to comport ourselves in an era of shrinking resources.

03Original abstract

A few of us lonely voices have long been warning (e.g., Wolfensberger, 1994, 1997) that the culture of modernism, as embraced by the United States and more or less all other Western societies, is not sustainable, and that collapses both are bound to occur and could be very sudden. Experts on systems theory are well aware that complex systems in particular can collapse much more quickly and drastically than simple ones and are also more difficult to restore. The recent economic crisis is the result of one such unsustainability, and happened with such startling suddenness that even the world's leading economic experts were taken by surprise.There are several points about the current financial crisis of relevance to our discussion.1. The current crisis has been brought about by a combination of the country living beyond its means and a systematic transfer of wealth by immoral (even if legal) means from the lower and middle classes to the uppermost—and widely unproductive, parasitic—class. There is no work that warrants someone getting paid $464 million a year, as many hedge fund managers were in 2008 (Armangue, 2009). No one creates any real new wealth like that, even in a lifetime.Strangely enough, even the economic experts of the world, and the world-class mathematicians (“quants”) who built the mathematical models for the financial market, not only failed to foresee the coming disaster but even contributed to it happening, yet they cannot fully explain it. They have not yet understood the dynamics of postprimary and postsecondary production economies like ours that produce less and less and surrender much manufacture and agriculture to other countries, from whom they then buy commodities and products by going into debt. This is said to “save money” when, in fact, it ruins a country over the long run. Ironically, the leading “quant” who was a major actor in bringing about the 2008 collapse, Daniel Xi Li, was well on his way to a Nobel Prize when his theories blew up (Philips, 2009).2. Societal developments always find expressions in the domain of human services, and a big expression at present—and the one we are concerned with here—is a reduction, as well as feared further reduction, of public funding of human services and advocacy. Even such bodies that are privately funded are experiencing hardships because of reduction of their investment income, capital, paying clients, and/or private donations, the latter despite fairly desperate appeals. When all of society suffers hardships, service and advocacy bodies, and families of vulnerable people, should not imagine that the hardships will pass them by.3. Economic hardships are known to have particularly severe impacts on already vulnerable people.4. There are many authorities in economics, politics, and the media who tell us that the current crisis will be short lived, that recovery will soon (or “is bound to”) take place, and that economic growth will continue where it left off in 2007. However, there are also some doubters, myself included, who suspect that we will never see the prosperity of 2007 again, or for very long. Also, we need to face the fact that as the lonely voices keep pointing out, an even bigger collapse of Western cultural ways is inevitable, sooner or later. Yet, a large proportion of the population does not want to hear these things. They want to be given “good news” and what they call “hope” —in other words, they want to be lied to.5. Even if the financial markets recover somewhat, sooner or later, things must get much worse. There are at least eight reasons why it is doubtful that economic recovery will occur, or will last long if it does.6. What is fairly well understood—though also ignored—is that there are not too many ways in a country can beyond its as we have been is of its 2009). all our current are by going into to other have also been the and the means of production to countries, we have been in a way for the of up and is way of going into to Also, in the United States is a big to the country that the has to There are also of of of by and and and these too are a to the are from the The soon need a of and not to their means is what the experts and as the to the in and of the of no more than and in The is to in a us that more in the need to and 2009). The of even to and the are of the of our was to the with and to of the of 2009). in of the that that if on it have not any that the in society and human services are to that major will have to be on there has been of to other on and be a way of living but no one to The have of what has been going They want lower and and if these are an given a they and/or their as has happened in a of the as well as of such a quickly public by going into or The of several other have for the of economic The of several have been to and are on the (e.g., any that on have any to or their of the to but not least face a of in over a and some are like if the will have to major the of are even even in They want but not that people, even Even the of the financial or work in it has the and yet a a and said in that the the crisis in its and of the for on where to and not one human service the in more to their than the they and other of to the public of they the said was that the must to or face a of the public will not to any 2009). A was to on 2009). When the some very and new such as a on and on such as and was on all of and his to The then an of the to no at The was and and to A that the was the only in the its that of the year, also the by but it was as by one when it was in to a to the a a few than their of a or the of or or is in is one of all over the country of their into the the will will their and the only way to off our large will be by the our will for our by several in the have on their The in human service and paid advocacy has been of and has in a desperate of the service and its advocacy all other a and service and advocacy bodies for the is the of where the and other are at to take from as a result of funding and to for for or some have to call it and to be 2009). The that or for their services as to where be the is very that it should be some other that should be of there were in up over other over the have also contributed to want more and more have of has and and is of the of take our take that of the other service or advocacy or bodies, and the take the have no that the service and advocacy are to that major will have to be on there has been of to other need to up to the fact that in human services as in other we have very and taken a of things for that a or society will or soon no be to or even to and collapses of and in Western culture and are and will not be to us lonely the of our in a at the of in of in of the of and collapse of our and the of that, a in the even to who for work on the of and advocacy. was and was at of our in many of but also by that a many in that these about embraced the very of and that on the of the the and the of vulnerable and people, and further many of have was in our in The of the a of for the is going to in a and is not going to any 1994, can also there that said the an of collapse are the financial such as systems and by collapse into also that a of collapse to to the of in the of the human services that our and in many with can no with because of complex these of the other things said in was that should because it also said that the of the culture of the the and and and and that are not and cannot be with are or want to want to what what are going to about said also that and are like the a few from is there one or it or and to of our one it or cannot it This was at the new that up to When one up the will with a said that at of or will and for for the the was well for the because it was also There was more over the fact that not than that the was going to in a and no However, one in it a on our we are a very country in even the in one that be to in is that vulnerable will and when things get all service and are by the current that have at least over the short are the The are not to that are by the or that are (e.g., that the in are money” from that were in to and have a of service or that have very and such as the and and the of who take of a to no or only a and have no in the for that from the of the have were left to the to However, funding will not last very the we keep that there was one big when in we have The was the of the the one soon the the was in the and the was an of by the into the This what by the to that on the of who have is into the of There was a recent of the on the crisis will to 2009). The of the said that one of the recent and service will to their even if they have to their other words, the economic will more on or service than on service that or even the service no be and the in the services are to be into a of are and for them we in human services and advocacy need to and of about what to to our and what we can that is in our to get the service for the need to a and such as the we were given a of we it as to get the service for are the of we to what it What the least What service the for many up getting for are we going to will we for to the our we also need to a of we of ways of the and also need to a with or the will one and both we to these will be by and and any of of can vulnerable off than if the of been the are by in who not the service like that get into the they with of and they in the much or even of that no what we to we will have no in the we should have some to to the that we are given a will a of that at a should be to services that are of if or This the many human service that keep over the human service in that and it is then then from a then then then and any one a proportion of human service of the of of of and that is not as and even as be much more What by the are that have been known to work for or even of This why are no to or even service a many of that are for what call are that are by the or of a or other words, what to or for the in the way of services and that is on what the real of that and that than we can of service not only in service but also in and are that the way a service is but that are not from of the or They things such as what the or or what the funding or in the what or a and there are who can and will the is very that a service on the of what is and is a service a large of a and can the of as when funding is with for to that the funding However, the to what is and to the and of the and to be and in all of ways by the a or funding a that not be to what a is that the of people, of human service have been that they as if they were many human service at least as if it were the if the then it must be for and the must be for also to into that and of services and of and/or and way to of the is that they all are of the big that we hear the our our and one of up in one should it is a that is an because of some have for for of for off and This a of on and in of work that could be because it is for reasons at any is not very is of and even these can be very in they have and that in of they only a of their and are to by the There is also the that what a to beyond the is and there is no to fund or only to that the was to and the to we will have but with to like to and managers of This is not an because there in fact, who are and but who have one or more and a of there is no to on an as some have been all in with in some for a with a (e.g., 2009). they are paid to and for a way to and the of also the of service and their families much is There are and for of these have been they paid such but no A even and a The to these and the to some other but both and the and get funded even as many are left the of is from by the funding is to for and is to and as long as When much the service is by a more and a less the more one should be or is services that in some are by both public and private but at a much by the public see in where a service is by the very and at with much less private even when these are funded by the The be to of of by off its services to private only a over private services that it privately services can be much less than by the of the for should be to funding for services that or to in going the a to with a service even the is not or The and has such a also has a paid who to with The to paid for A that have a to have service with of the are and cannot be in the with the This was even as the was of to for both a and a on of all the other for in a is the of that will be and we need to be of the of and that for any of for who at one were from on the such as a to and from and and are on by and service Even if such are privately paid that of should be on the for on should any or that are there are even in human services, in or is one human service in our who to a year, for bringing in big we not have much over in the paid more than a and its million 2009). of private are in the and even many are an who a will the if the were to be to a then the be it is that such a if there were no such to be They be to get only a is also in the of some one can in at a of This in an to very and then take on a in human services at about the as and from the combination of new and even a on of in any are particularly if the service are as is the in our and a few other and should be to of services that are with some on them with get or some get to the of about a to in their with have no one who for their and some of their to a very in it is with a of them who get the their get the is in such as these that the of and The is but is also a in that few get to a They are to get to in a or a has for been as the for with any of the many in to that are with is one where can when are getting the of their is why and have to in to get the last few of However, with families who taken of an at and who were that they to with who were about for are many in such as paid of of a them could up for However, about human services to vulnerable There are services of there are as well as When to a service as to no service at but the less one can be at lower it is to for a or of the less than to have no at in any of are to no at a in a with was to to be to be in a the be with than with one need or could be several there never any but the in a classes be more than but large ones are than at is that there are and of the but again, the one is than at when are it is to have classes than no at are and if they were ones at that, then is for with a to be in a or to have no at are one can on at one were like to in we not society take both living and and us the even have never and in in some some have already to be (e.g., and has been we need to keep in that even services can be and in many the fact that these are more than can with in that the less be both less and more there is about not to and up with of service and and are particularly in of the fact that a of the that who have been to for the of several service or living will be if they get any one at other words, that of the that for service the to more over less at is fact, it was never to that no to to the of their there is one way for some people, in and that is to have and public funding with private and the in some for people, a less than the of a in a few be to a from a to a more and more need to to the of what call and services, are all that are not of a or paid and they can be or in are what or of for a is of a in that it is by a and paid are for a service advocacy because the and of the and advocacy are but the are to a and also in for some services can a one of the for the not be to were it not for its many have of the service and many (e.g., see the of advocacy is not widely and advocacy has on of is that even their they are these paid are the to be This then who want to but are not well them from have for call for the or of such for people, as the only that in many will be of at least some when the them and/or when as it in in bodies should at least a and are the to be but if such long one up with even more than one and recovery is not because the get and will not have models and at least some and that is and a service can be from very much and it even be to like a from the if financial What we should to the to even to funding services that the of of other or A is services a up in a and where the service a of the like services have been the of reduction a has and suspect that the is services for and should funding if it of a of have or have been to them by services for more than 2009). or more than to its other things for for the who must into their services for families with an at can also more services are also of at least some of these keep their of and of an in was the that a be This have by other services to as much as and many into where the are much as to the we should be to service that the or such as of who have to in to to other are or in for of also no to for or families that have such for the is 2009). is should be for the to very such as to of services to are that to into the and to of a of by but are also the to be in a was to 2009). Even a one of for the these of is a of and A has been to for to people, more at one or of in a way that the of one is or many as and all of the have the that they can their by some of their the as if were not also the and were not to that such a is a of the of and will always more in the services into but is too an to with and to what one call service public on a that in other services that are not by but by by This to families who will in a of their and to a much service and the of service of a service is advocacy because these have to who will some with have on of their and even many are the only is funding a advocacy that some to and a large of few have understood the of is why it has on such even advocacy on a The of should be taken much more there are in in services and in more that have and economic the less will they be and the less paid services will they all these need to be from and economic have been because of an on from and on such things as and and economic the and to work and to to the of is to see many with the that they were of but no can because have and there has been much said about and but is a these and This is the result of in service one but many services have into less fact, they have been the of the the who are the last from and who not even the of are where is but are very to be and and to and and They are as not only because of their but also their have never and They not to to buy or even to buy and They then buy to be brought in and of the of the is a of the of service that in is or that the service have no growth Also, many services have no financial to difficult to is the funding for have more for but they also have many are or in the of who are their must be paid to public because if these will all and service funding even work beyond the and current There is any that the a is known as to are or even can be and and they not only and and in and and for people, a long way to and are very into to as the to any of with going to then and with and such as the of and and to already over of to have are are to even because of the or such as that their in the very of and are not and not can we to in of such they are and They are then who by were not in the or and who could even us much and big if we them too as in the from is a of in of economic are for and not to them and then it that the who in these to and to who are on such as (e.g., 2009). are as is very to a of want to be a fact is that for any of to other and will have a to as is already the in several The and to take is a for and what call a of that the of and and all and already said in to the must be a for one also very to services that the of vulnerable to of services, at least that not as the for of these points have also in in The of What and and What They and to must be ways of in human services, there are of many ways of more of human services, but to the latter beyond the of Also, when of human services, we need to our it is more for us to to public to real than to some have that the should for its are several that some or all of the should not be but should be in to and in a take funding of funding can very large because they are in the of or because they more services, but other of are in the of and/or is an of an of that into the and into the of least many the for have been despite all the and and a of in recent no one to be to the about have been the of work for people, because in and even if is to about in of the but or with is also to be in work that much of a than to be in paid work (e.g., a work that only a few a have been at least major to work by is is but if we not get and keep our on such as then a society will not have the to with will and we will get less than what we could have of is There are to all of but a public or with has are going to have to many of from tell us the we been we have no one to for is one of and then to their by only for and the take the has of or more advocacy getting to an and to that no one an it be difficult to get to the of a of an should find it to that have been for is to what some are in the that are up 2009). where are any of us any in human services, or even on the things in our is that we not even have a for and our on an The of is not an for even if were to to all or of where we to a is is like an and/or an of that not and that to and to when they are on the on but despite the and the not to be is like to the in who were that their last not into but be less and and keep the of with have to the of should that some of the things that financial for a is on a given at the of the on and in

Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2011 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-49.6.477