Developing behavior analysis at the state level.
Florida’s 1987 playbook—certify analysts, partner with universities, write state rules—still guides today’s push for nationwide ABA infrastructure.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Rutter et al. (1987) tell the story of how Florida built a statewide behavior-analysis system.
They worked with state agencies, universities, and service providers.
The paper is a case study, not an experiment, so it has no outcome data.
What they found
Florida created rules that required certified behavior analysts in state programs.
University courses fed new analysts into the system.
The setup lasted, showing other states a ready-made blueprint.
How this fits with other research
Saunders et al. (2005) pick up where Florida left off. They urge the field to leave small clinic pilots and aim for public-health scale.
de la Cruz et al. (2025) show the next step: behavior analysts now lobby lawmakers for licensure and insurance funds.
McGee et al. (2019) add a warning. They say map your agency with behavioral systems analysis before you grow, something Florida did informally.
Why it matters
If you want ABA services in your state, copy Florida’s three levers: certification rules, university pipelines, and agency partnerships. Use McGee’s systems map first to spot bottlenecks. Then push legislators with the advocacy tactics in de la Cruz et al. (2025). You turn a demo project into durable policy.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Draft a one-page systems map of your agency showing where new clients get stuck, then schedule a call with your state ABA chapter to share it.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Over the past fifteen years, behavior analysts in Florida have worked together to develop the discipline with a multifaceted system of contingencies. Basing their effort in the area of retardation and with the cooperation of the state's Developmental Services Program Office, they have gradually developed a regulatory manual of programming policy and procedures, a hierarchical system of responsibilities for programming approval and monitoring, a state-sponsored certification program, a professional association, and an active university community. These components are described and discussed in terms of suggested principles for developing the field of behavior analysis within a state.
The Behavior analyst, 1987 · doi:10.1007/BF03392431