Service Delivery

Determinants of inclusive education of 8-12 year-old children with cerebral palsy in 9 European regions.

Sentenac et al. (2013) · Research in developmental disabilities 2013
★ The Verdict

A child with cerebral palsy in Europe is more or less likely to sit in a regular class simply because of the region, not because of how mild or severe the disability is.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who consult on school placement or write IEPs for European children with CP.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only serving U.S. school districts where placement rules differ.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team looked at school records for 8- to 12-year-old children with cerebral palsy in nine European regions.

They asked: after we account for how severe the child’s motor and thinking problems are, does the region still predict whether the child is in a regular class?

02

What they found

Even when the kids had the same level of impairment, some regions still placed far more children in mainstream schools than others.

In short, your ZIP code matters as much as your diagnosis.

03

How this fits with other research

Guillemot et al. (2024) extend this picture. They asked French parents how included their children felt. Better parent-teacher links and solid accommodations raised well-being, but the benefit shrank as kids got older.

de Leeuw et al. (2024) show the same regional-luck pattern in Ireland, only with money: adults with ID cost up to €119 000 more per year in some counties even after adjusting for need.

Bøttcher et al. (2013) add a warning. Their review says kids with CP are at high risk for mental-health problems when the environment does not fit the child. The Mariane finding—unequal school inclusion—may be one reason why.

04

Why it matters

If you write IEPs for European children with CP, do not assume placement is purely clinical. Ask what region you are in, check local inclusion rates, and push for the least restrictive setting if numbers look low. Track parent-teacher rapport and whether accommodations feel fair—Françoise’s data show these levers lift inclusion feelings fast.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pull your region’s mainstream-inclusion rate for CP and add a justification line in the IEP if you want a regular class but local numbers are low.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Population
other
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The principle of inclusive education has been increasingly recognised over recent decades and most countries officially support schooling of children with disabilities in mainstream settings. The SPARCLE study offers the opportunity to report on the schooling practices for children with cerebral palsy according to the nature and severity of their impairments and the schooling policy in European regions. The aim of this paper is to describe the type of schooling of children with cerebral palsy in various European regions after controlling for relevant individual factors. Children aged 8-12 years with cerebral palsy from 9 European regions and their families were interviewed. Our findings support the hypothesis that between-region variations in the type of schooling are still significant after adjustment for individual factors; and that motor function and intellectual ability have different effects on inclusion in mainstream school, depending on the region.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.019