Service Delivery

Cost-benefit analysis of a non-government organization and Australian government collaborative supported employment program for autistic people.

Hedley et al. (2023) · Autism : the international journal of research and practice 2023
★ The Verdict

A new Australian narrative says the DXC Dandelion tech-jobs program saves government money, backing up earlier UK and US cost studies that also show supported employment pays off when the job fit is tight.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing adult-transition or employment goals for high-functioning autistic clients.
✗ Skip if Practitioners focused only on early-intervention or non-vocational daily living skills.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Hedley et al. (2023) wrote a story-style review about the DXC Dandelion Program. The program places autistic adults in information and communication technology jobs. A non-profit and the Australian government run it together. The authors looked at whether the program saves public money.

They used past records and expert guesses. They did not run a new experiment. The paper is a narrative, not a number-crunched trial.

02

What they found

The review claims the Dandelion plan cuts government costs. It does this by moving autistic adults off benefits and into paid tech work. The authors say wages go up and support bills go down. No exact dollar amounts are given.

The study also notes that workers stay in their jobs. Stable work means steady tax income and less need for extra help.

03

How this fits with other research

Mavranezouli et al. (2014) found the same pattern in the UK. Supported employment for autistic adults cost only £18 for each extra week worked. When housing and service savings were added, the program paid for itself. Darren’s 2023 story lines up with these older British numbers.

Cimera et al. (2009) looked at US vocational rehab data and saw the highest service costs for autistic clients. That sounds like the opposite of Darren’s savings claim. The gap is explained by who was studied. Evert’s group covered all ability levels and used generic rehab. Darren’s group is high-functioning adults in a tight tech match. Specialized fit lowers extra spending.

Green et al. (1987) ran the first benefit-cost study on supported work for adults with intellectual disability. Every dollar spent returned about $1.90. Darren’s autism-focused review echoes this long-standing math: the right job match saves public money.

04

Why it matters

You can use this narrative when you write adult-transition plans or speak to funders. Point to the 35-year track record that shows supported employment pays back. Stress that careful job matching, like placing tech-savvy autistic adults in ICT roles, is the key. Ask for the extra setup funds by showing the long-term savings story, not just the social-good story.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add one line to the ITP that cites cost-savings evidence when you request supported-employment funds.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Relative to the size of the population, there are fewer autistic people than non-autistic people in the workforce. Employment programs that provide extra support to autistic people may help them to gain and keep jobs that are suited to their skills and expertise. In this study, we reviewed the DXC Dandelion Program. This is a supported autism employment program run in partnership with the Australian Government. The program provided jobs to autistic people who worked in information and communications technology roles, such as software testing and cyber security. In this study, we examined some of the benefits of the program for the autistic people who participated in it. We also examined the benefits of the program to the government. We found that there are many savings to government when autistic people are employed in jobs that are matched to their skills and abilities, compared to being unemployed or working in jobs that are below their level of education, training, or skills.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2023 · doi:10.1177/13623613221138643