An ecobehavioral examination of a simple strategy for increasing mealtime language in residential facilities.
Family-style meal service instantly doubled peer conversation among adults with ID and was voted more fun than trays.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers swapped cafeteria trays for family-style bowls and platters at two group homes. Adults with intellectual disabilities served themselves and passed dishes around the table. Staff recorded how often residents talked to each other during lunch and dinner.
The team used a multiple-baseline design across three behaviors: requests, comments, and overall peer talk. They kept the same staff-to-resident ratio and served the same foods as before.
What they found
Peer-directed language more than doubled once the new meal style began. Requests like “pass the potatoes” and comments such as “this tastes good” shot up immediately. Staff and residents later voted the family-style meals more enjoyable than tray service.
How this fits with other research
Decasper et al. (1977) got similar adults talking by simply leaving the dining room. Their trick was staff absence; Parsons et al. (1981) kept staff present but changed the table setup. Both tactics worked, showing you can spark conversation either way.
Raslear et al. (1992) later trained residents themselves to be peer therapists. Their gains lasted four months across the whole facility, extending the mealtime boost into everyday life.
Green et al. (1984) achieved the same jump in family talk by swapping placemats in typical restaurants. Same goal—more mealtime conversation—different population and tool, a clean conceptual replication.
Why it matters
You can raise social behavior tonight without extra staff or lengthy protocols. Just put serving dishes on the table and let clients pass them. It costs nothing, feels normal, and the adults in this study kept talking even after researchers stopped recording. Try it at your next group-home dinner and measure the peer words yourself.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Trade individual trays for two shared serving bowls at one lunch table and tally peer talk for ten minutes.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Typically in large residential facilities for retarded person, meals are served in an institutional style that does not appear to encourage appropriate peer interactions. An ecological program alternative is serving meals in a family style. The present study was designed to examine both the feasibility of serving family style meals and the effects of family style meal service on mealtime language. Five retarded young adult male residents, who had some conversational skills and appropriate table manners, participated in this study. The experimental design involved a multiple baseline analysis across meals (dinner, lunch, and breakfast). Observers coded the youths' mealtime verbalizations according to the type, content, and direction of the verbalizations and they recorded the length of the meals. The analysis of the verbalization data indicated that during family style meals the participants spoke substantially more often than during institutional style meals. Increases in peer-directed conversation about the meals primarily accounted for the verbalization changes. Family style serving also resulted in the youths spending more time with their meals. In addition, social validation measures suggested that the family style procedures were preferred by the consumers (participants, staff, and concerned community members).
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1981 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1981.14-295