Service Delivery

A review of antipsychotic drugs prescribed for people with learning disabilities who live in Leicestershire.

Branford (1996) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 1996
★ The Verdict

About forty percent of adults with learning disabilities can stay on lower doses or no antipsychotic after a careful year-long taper, so systematic reduction is possible but needs close watch.

✓ Read this if BCBAs and RBTs working with adults with intellectual disability who take antipsychotics in residential or day programs.
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving only children with autism or clients with no psychoactive meds.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Doctors in Leicestershire, England looked at 123 adults with learning disabilities who were taking antipsychotic drugs. The team tried to lower or stop the drugs for each person and watched what happened for one year.

This was a case series, not a true experiment. Each person got an individual taper plan and regular check-ups.

02

What they found

After twelve months, 31 people stayed completely drug-free. Forty others stayed on smaller doses than before. Fifty-two people had to go back to at least part of the original dose.

In plain numbers, about four in ten kept a lower dose or none at all, while six in ten needed some of the drug again.

03

How this fits with other research

Walley et al. (2005) also tracked adults with learning disabilities, but they added the seizure drug topiramate instead of taking anything away. Both studies show that careful, slow medication changes can be done safely in this group.

Robinson et al. (1981) and Wallace et al. (2010) tried low-cost behavior tricks—teacher wait-time and simple card labels—to cut problem behavior or boost thinking. Their good results line up with Branford (1996): you can often replace or reduce drugs if you watch closely and give other support.

No direct clash exists here, but the newer behavior papers hint that adding teaching tools first might let even more people taper drugs later.

04

Why it matters

If you serve adults with ID who take antipsychotics, this paper says a planned reduction is worth trying—but only with tight monitoring. Build a team: doctor, nurse, BCBA, and direct support staff. Track target behaviors weekly. Have a quick back-up plan if behaviors spike. Pair the taper with proven behavior or skill-building programs so the person gains something while the drug goes down.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one med-heavy client, graph their challenging behaviors this week, and schedule a team meeting to discuss a tiny dose cut paired with a new reinforcement plan.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
case series
Sample size
198
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

Antipsychotic drugs are widely prescribed for people with learning disabilities to control challenging behaviour. Concern has been expressed that such prescribing is excessive, inappropriate and potentially harmful. A review of 198 patients with learning disabilities resulted in agreement to reduce or withdraw antipsychotic drug therapy in 123 cases. The antipsychotic drug therapy was totally withdrawn in 43 cases and the dose reduced for the remaining 80. Out of the 43 patients who underwent total drug withdrawal, 31 remained off such therapy and 12 required represcribing within a 12-month period. Out of the remaining 80 who underwent dose reduction, 40 suffered a deterioration in behaviour which resulted in some degree of dose increase, and 40, although maintained on a lower dose, neither achieved total withdrawal nor deteriorated to an extent that a dose increase was required.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 1996 · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.1996.778778.x