A qualitative evaluation of the pathway for eating disorders and autism developed from clinical experience (PEACE): clinicians' perspective.
Clinicians say an autism-friendly eating-disorder pathway lifts engagement, but clearer tweak rules and post-discharge plans are missing.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Leng et al. (2024) asked eating-disorder clinicians about the PEACE pathway. PEACE is a care map that tweaks treatment for autistic patients.
The team ran focus groups and interviews. They wanted to know what helps and what hinders real-world use.
What they found
Staff said PEACE boosts patient engagement and lifts team confidence.
They also flagged gaps: unclear tweak rules and weak after-discharge plans.
How this fits with other research
Donnelly et al. (2021) heard the same tune on a child psych ward. Their autism pathway cut crisis events when staff used visual aids and early rewards.
Habayeb et al. (2025) extend the idea to primary care. Training pediatric teams to do autism assessments slashed wait times for 250 families.
Øverland et al. (2025) sound a caution note. Norwegian clinicians say they “think autism” in every move, yet outside observers have not caught real practice change. The PEACE story adds eating-disorder detail but shares the same risk: good intent needs hard checks.
Why it matters
If you run or consult on eating-disorder services, borrow PEACE tools for sensory tweaks and discharge bridges. Pair them with Donnelly’s reward-spotting routine and Serene’s fast-track mindset. Then build in fidelity checks so the pathway lives past good intentions.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a one-page sensory preference sheet to the intake packet and schedule a discharge warm-handoff call before the client leaves.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The Pathway for Eating disorders and Autism developed from Clinical Experience (PEACE pathway) is a clinical pathway of adapted treatment for individuals with eating disorders and autism in the UK. This study aims to investigate multidisciplinary clinicians’ views of the strengths and challenges of PEACE pathway adaptations, while identifying areas where further improvement is needed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 clinicians who worked on the PEACE pathway. Themes relevant to the benefits, challenges and areas of improvement were identified, and a thematic map was produced. PEACE Pathway brought clinical benefits such as improved understanding of patients’ perspective, improved flexibility and individualisation in clinicians’ approach, increased patient engagement, and provision of resources that are helpful to all patients with or without autism. Benefits to the service included increase in autism awareness, clinicians’ confidence, and team collaboration. Challenges were also identified, including difficulties in incorporating autism adaptations into existing treatment protocol, implementing PEACE at different levels of care, staff schedule conflicts, and increased pressure to meet patients’ needs. Overall, there is a need for systemic improvement in aftercare and community support for autism, more suitable autism screening tool, and more structured guidelines for making adaptations. PEACE Pathway has brought clinical and service benefits, while also bringing practical challenges rooted in the difficulty in distinguishing between autism and eating disorder in comorbid population. Future areas of improvement are highlighted for PEACE resources as well as in the national support system for autistic individuals.
Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2024 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1332441