Service Delivery

A longitudinal study of the intra-country variations in the provision of residential care for adult persons with an intellectual disability.

McConkey et al. (2013) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2013
★ The Verdict

National data reveal huge regional gaps in moving adults with ID from large facilities to community homes.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who plan residential transitions or consult on adult services.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only work with children in home or school settings.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

McGeown et al. (2013) tracked where adults with intellectual disability lived for ten years. They used the national ID database to see who moved out of large congregate settings.

The study covered the whole country, not just one city. It counted how many people shifted to smaller community homes in each region.

02

What they found

Less than 15 % of adults moved from big institutions to community homes over the decade. Some regions moved almost no one; others moved far more.

The data showed a patchwork: neighboring areas could differ by wide margins.

03

How this fits with other research

Moss et al. (2008) saw a 70 % drop in large-institution use across the United States between 1977 and 2007. McGeown et al. (2013) now show that, inside one country, the same shift crawls along at under 15 % in ten years. The national picture hides slow local progress.

Cohen-Almeida et al. (2000) followed one Scottish region for twenty years and found about half of adults moved to community homes. Their single-region rate beats the national rate reported by R et al., proving that local policy and funding—not just time—drive change.

Lerman et al. (1995) proved that moving out of institutions can boost adaptive skills within six months. R et al. remind us that opportunity to move depends on where you live; the benefit is real but access is uneven.

04

Why it matters

If you write transition plans or place adults in housing, map your region’s track record. Compare it with nearby areas and use the numbers to argue for fairer funding or faster timelines. Your client may be stuck in a setting not because they need it, but because the local system moves slowly.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pull your state’s residential placement stats and compare them with the national figure—use any shortfall to justify more community referrals.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
7000
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Small-scale community accommodation is the preferred alternative internationally to the institutional and congregated services that previously dominated residential care for persons with intellectual disability. The strategies required for changing to new service models are not well researched. METHOD: The National Intellectual Disability Database in Ireland provided the data to explore the changes in provision that occurred over a 10-year period and the extent of the intra-country variation across eight administrative areas for health services. Data were extracted for 2 years, 1999 and 2009, for over 7000 adult persons resident in either congregated or community-based accommodation. Comparative indicators were calculated for the eight areas as well as nationally. In addition, over 4000 persons living in congregated settings were tracked over the 10 years to ascertain relocations as well as gathering information on the numbers of people newly admitted to each type of accommodation. RESULTS: Marked variations across the eight areas were found in the overall numbers of people in residential accommodation, the proportion of persons living in congregated settings and the extent of changes in the numbers of people in each type of accommodation. Moreover, fewer than 15% of people had relocated nationally from congregated settings over the 10-year period and the number of new admissions to this form of provision remained high in certain areas. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of new forms of provision was not uniform across Ireland and possible reasons are proposed. Among the wider lessons internationally is the need for robust systems to monitor service provision nationally and locally if equity of access is to be achieved.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2013 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01592.x