Using assessment-based curricular intervention to improve the classroom behavior of a student with emotional and behavioral challenges.
A quick student interview plus classroom FBA can build a light package that keeps kids on task all year in gen-ed rooms.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team worked with one elementary student who had big behavior problems in class.
They asked the child what was hard and watched him in three different classrooms.
From that quick FBA they built a small package of changes and tried it all year.
What they found
The boy stayed on task far more in every class.
The gains held from fall to spring without extra staff.
How this fits with other research
Dunlap et al. (1991) did the same FBA-to-curriculum move first, but in a high-school special-ed room.
Matson et al. (1994) shows the idea also works in regular elementary classes, so the setting gap is closed.
TCruz-Montecinos et al. (2024) now gives us a faster checklist called ADC-B that picks academic fixes better than the old interview-and-test route.
Pollack et al. (2024) warns that most FBA plans skip trauma-informed steps; the 1994 package did not include them either, so today you may want to add that layer.
Why it matters
You can copy the simple recipe: five-minute student interview, short classroom probe, then pick one antecedent or consequence tweak.
No extra staff, no tokens, just fit the intervention to the function.
Try it next week with any kid whose behavior bounces across classes.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Ask the student what part of class is hardest, watch one period, then change one antecedent tied to that answer.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We evaluated a process of descriptive assessment, functional assessment, and assessment-based intervention with an elementary-school child who was described as having emotional and behavioral challenges, but who also exhibited above-average intelligence and communication skills. During a hypothesis-development phase, information was gathered from several sources including an interview that was conducted directly with the participant. Descriptive information collected during this phase produced five hypotheses about variables maintaining the problem behavior that were then tested experimentally in the classroom environment. The resulting functional assessment data supported the hypotheses. Intervention packages based on the hypotheses were implemented sequentially across English, spelling, and math classes. The interventions were successful in increasing on-task behavior, and the improvements were maintained for the remainder of the school year.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1994 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-7