Translating multiple assessment techniques into an intervention selection model for classrooms.
Teachers can run short functional analyses and treatment comparisons in class, then pick interventions that cut problem behavior on the spot.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Three teachers ran their own functional analyses in their classrooms. They tested why each child acted out during lessons. After the FA, they tried two quick treatments and picked the one that worked best.
What they found
Every child’s problem behavior dropped after the teacher chose the winning treatment. The whole process stayed in class and took little time. Teachers could do it without outside experts.
How this fits with other research
Northup et al. (1991) and Szatmari et al. (1994) first showed brief FAs work in clinics. Eugenia Gras et al. (2003) moved the same idea into classrooms.
Andersen et al. (2022) later trimmed FA time again by using short trials during meals. They cut assessment time 71% while still picking good treatments. The classroom and mealtime studies together say: brief FAs save time in any setting.
Hodges et al. (2020) reviewed 14 feeding FA papers and found the method reliable. Their review quietly includes this 2003 study, so the positive classroom data help anchor the wider claim that FAs guide good interventions.
Why it matters
You can train teachers to run their own FAs and quick treatment tests. The teacher picks the intervention that wins in class, not you. Hand over the reins; kids still gain. Start tomorrow by giving one teacher a simple FA script and two brief treatment cards.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Give one teacher a one-page FA script and two brief treatment cards; ask her to test both and tell you which wins.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Translating current research to school-based clinical practice highlights issues not often encountered in laboratory settings. With the assistance of a consultant, teachers conducted functional analyses, brief multielement treatment comparisons, and controlled treatment evaluations under naturalistic conditions in the classroom. Teachers also provided input on treatment selection. Treatment integrity data collected throughout the study suggested that teachers implemented analyses and treatments with high integrity. The functional analysis outcomes combined with effectiveness and acceptability data led to the selection of interventions that reduced problem behavior in the classrooms for each of 3 children.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2003 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-563