School & Classroom

Selection and Implementation of Skill Acquisition Programs by Special Education Teachers and Staff for Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Kodak et al. (2018) · Behavior modification 2018
★ The Verdict

Special-ed teachers often skip core DTI pieces—check trial flow today.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who coach school staff running discrete trials.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only do home-based EIBI.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Kodak et al. (2018) asked special-ed teachers how they run receptive-ID lessons.

They used a survey. Staff described the steps they take during trial-based teaching.

02

What they found

Teachers often skipped or changed key DTI steps.

Prompts, reinforcement, and error correction looked different from the book.

03

How this fits with other research

Parsons et al. (1981) showed kids learn fast when each trial links the response to the reward. Tiffany’s data say teachers rarely build that link today.

Heinicke et al. (2012) reviewed 687 small-group lessons. When staff followed every prompt step, almost every child hit mastery. Tiffany shows the same steps are now missing.

Colón et al. (2019) found RIRD still works at 50% fidelity. That sounds like a free pass, but Tiffany’s gaps go lower and break DTI completely.

04

Why it matters

Your staff may run “DTI” that is not DTI. Use a one-page fidelity checklist before each session. Circle yes/no for prompt, response, consequence. Fix one missed step next trial.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Watch one receptive-ID trial and score prompt-response-reinforcer order; correct any missing piece on the very next trial.

02At a glance

Intervention
discrete trial training
Design
survey
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

The present investigation examined special education teachers' selection and use of teaching strategies for receptive identification training with children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in their classrooms. Teachers first responded to a survey in which they provided examples of receptive identification tasks taught in their classrooms, rated the efficacy of teaching strategies, described how they determined whether skills were mastered, listed any assessments they conducted to identify relevant prerequisite skills prior to receptive identification training, described how they selected teaching strategies for use in their classrooms, and listed their years of experience as a teacher and working with children with ASD. Subsequent observations of implementation of teaching strategies during trial-based instruction occurred in a proportion of teachers' classrooms. The results of the observations showed that participants did not consistently implement components of trial-based instruction as described in the literature, and there were differences in implementation depending on the types of skills targeted during instruction.

Behavior modification, 2018 · doi:10.1177/0145445517692081