Preschool children's acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. A study of three reading procedures.
Teach sight words first for speed, then layer brief phonics or syllable trials to grab their unique generalization gains.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team taught the preschoolers to read the same 18 words three different ways. Each child got sight-word drills, syllable-blending drills, and phonics-blending drills in a fast-switch design.
Sessions happened at a small table with flashcards and tokens. The order of methods changed daily so no one style had an edge.
What they found
Sight words won the speed race. Kids reached mastery in half the trials and made the fewest errors.
Yet each method gave a unique bonus. Only phonics kids could read brand-new CVC words. Only syllable kids could blend big words. Maintenance after two weeks was the same across the board.
How this fits with other research
Brayner de Freitas Gueiros et al. (2020) later showed preschoolers can gain emergent reading without any direct phonics trials. Their Go/No-Go method created picture-to-print relations in fewer sessions, suggesting you can get generalization faster than M et al. thought.
Miltenberger et al. (2013) meta-analysis found kids with dyslexia struggle on sequence tasks. M et al.'s sight-word shortcut may hide that risk in neurotypical kids, so watch for later sequencing problems.
Hedquist et al. (2020) used the same alternating-treatments logic to compare DRA and DRO. Both studies prove the design cleanly separates small procedural differences in real classrooms.
Why it matters
Start with sight words for quick wins and happy learners. After mastery, drop in a few phonics or syllable trials to pick up the generalization perks. One week of each add-on is enough; you keep the speed and gain the spill-over. Check later decoding skills early so any hidden sequencing issues don't slip past.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick three new sight words, teach to mastery, then add one untaught CVC word using the phonics method for five trials.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study examined the three reading procedures of sight, syllable blending, and phonics blending to determine which was the most efficient one to teach words for acquisition, maintenance, and various types of generalization. Six typical preschool children who did not recall and recognize the training words were selected as subjects. An individual analysis design was used in which all the subjects were taught all words, counterbalanced across the three reading procedures. All reading procedures were tailored to allow for the same number of training responses while using the identical modeling, imitation, and reinforcement technique. Results showed the sight procedure took the fewest training sessions to acquisition with the smallest number of errors, in comparison with syllable and phonics. But all words, regardless of the type of training, were maintained equally well. Considering the generalization measures, however, each procedure had unique advantages. Therefore, it is speculated how the three procedures might be combined for the beginning reader.
Behavior modification, 1986 · doi:10.1177/01454455860102002