Learner-generated drawing for phonological and orthographic dyslexic readers.
Having kids draw what they read lifts comprehension fastest in orthographic dyslexia.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Wang et al. (2013) asked kids with dyslexia to draw pictures of what they read. They split the kids into two groups: those who struggle with sounds (phonological) and those who struggle with word shapes (orthographic).
After reading short passages, each child made a quick sketch. The team then checked if the drawings helped the kids understand and remember the stories.
What they found
Every dyslexic reader scored better on comprehension tests after drawing. The orthographic group improved the most.
Drawing gave the strongest boost to kids who usually mix up similar-looking letters.
How this fits with other research
Galli et al. (2011) and Khalid et al. (2010) also studied kids’ drawings, but they used them as tests, not teaching tools. Their work shows we can measure fine-motor and timing problems through drawing; Li-Chih flips the idea and uses drawing to teach.
Cheng et al. (2024) reviewed many reading studies and found that kids with language disorders understand more when questions stay concrete. Sketching while reading keeps the task concrete, so the new results line up with that advice.
DeRoma et al. (2004) tried anaphoric cuing for students with autism and saw medium gains. Drawing produced larger gains for dyslexic readers, suggesting different tricks help different groups.
Why it matters
You can add a two-minute drawing break to any reading lesson. Hand the student a sticky note, ask them to sketch the scene, then discuss it. The tiny act boosts recall and works best for kids who confuse letter shapes. No extra gear, no long training—just paper, pencil, and stronger comprehension.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Give each learner a blank index card after a short passage and say, ‘Quick picture—show me what happened.’
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study presents an examination of learner-generated drawing for different reading comprehension subtypes of dyslexic students and control students. The participants were 22 phonological dyslexic students, 20 orthographic dyslexic students, 21 double-deficit dyslexic students, and 45 age-, gender-, and IQ-matched control students. The major evaluation tools included word recognition task, orthographic task, phonological awareness task, and scenery texts and questions. Comparisons of the four groups of students showed differences among phonological dyslexia, orthographic dyslexia, double-deficit dyslexia, and the chronological age control groups in pre- and posttest performance of scenery texts. Differences also existed in relevant questions and the effect of the learner-generated drawing method. The pretest performance showed problems in the dyslexic samples in reading the scenery texts and answering relevant questions. The posttest performance revealed certain differences among phonological dyslexia, orthographic dyslexia, double-deficit dyslexia, and the chronological age control group. Finally, all dyslexic groups obtained a great effect from using the learner-generated drawing, particularly orthographic dyslexia. These results suggest that the learner-generated drawing was also useful for dyslexic students, with the potential for use in the classroom for teaching text reading to dyslexic students.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.006