School & Classroom

Interteaching: the effects of quality points on exam scores.

Saville et al. (2009) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 2009
★ The Verdict

Interteaching works for undergrad learning, but tacking on quality points is wasted effort.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching college courses or training staff in classroom formats.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused on early-intervention or home-based ABA.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The researchers ran an alternating-treatments design in an undergraduate course.

Some prep sheets earned extra-credit “quality points,” others did not.

They then tracked exam scores to see if the points lifted performance.

02

What they found

Adding quality points did not change test scores.

Students scored the same whether or not their prep work earned bonus credit.

03

How this fits with other research

Shaw et al. (2024) later moved interteaching online and still saw quiz gains, showing the method works even when quality points are absent.

Rehfeldt et al. (2010) used a point contingency for homework return and also found zero exam boost, matching the null result here.

The pattern is clear: college points can shape behavior like turning work in, but they rarely touch actual test performance.

04

Why it matters

Stop spending time grading and tracking extra-credit quality points.

Keep the interteaching discussions; drop the bonus tally.

You free up minutes for better feedback without hurting scores.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Remove the quality-point rubric from your next interteaching unit and use the saved time to give verbal praise instead.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
alternating treatments
Population
neurotypical
Finding
null

03Original abstract

Although previous studies have found interteaching to be an effective alternative to traditional methods of instruction, few studies have examined which of its components contribute to its effectiveness. In the current study, we examined whether manipulating quality points had an effect on our students' exam scores. In two sections of an undergraduate general psychology course, we used interteaching but alternated between quality points and no quality points several times throughout the semester; we also counterbalanced the order of presentation across sections. We found that quality points did not have an effect on exam scores.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2009 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-369