Facilitation of the acquisition and retention of sight-word vocabulary through token reinforcement.
Tokens plus praise beat praise alone for teaching sight words.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The researchers worked with second-grade classes.
They compared two ways to teach sight words.
One group got flash cards plus praise.
The other group got flash cards, praise, and plastic tokens.
Kids could trade tokens later for small prizes.
Both groups had the same number of practice trials.
What they found
The token group learned new words faster.
They also remembered more words after a delay.
Praise alone helped, but tokens plus praise worked better.
The gap stayed big even weeks later.
How this fits with other research
Kirby et al. (1981) copied the idea and added a bingo game.
Kids still earned tokens, and accuracy jumped to over 90%.
The game twist shows the same principle works when practice is fun.
Kupzyk et al. (2011) swapped tokens for a special flash-card drill called Strategic Incremental Rehearsal.
They still beat plain flash cards, proving faster learning can come from either richer reinforcement or smarter drill design.
Clark et al. (1973) did the same thing a year earlier with pennies and praise for reading comprehension.
Together these papers build a chain: add something extra—tokens, games, or better drill—and kids learn more words in less time.
Why it matters
If you run sight-word drills, drop a token board on the desk.
Hand a token for every correct response, let kids trade ten for a sticker.
You will see faster mastery and stronger recall with almost no extra prep.
It is a five-minute setup that pays off for weeks.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Put ten plastic counters in your pocket; give one after each correct sight-word response and let the learner trade them for a preferred item at the end.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Two groups of second-grade children were taught to read orally 30 words and were later tested for retention. One group of subjects received verbal consequences, while the other group received verbal consequences plus token reinforcement. The token group reached criterion in significantly fewer trials and correctly read significantly more words on the retention tests after the longer retention intervals.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1974 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1974.7-307