Effects of an audio cueing system on the rate of teacher praise.
Simple auditory beeps on a variable schedule triple teacher praise rates in days.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Zentall et al. (1975) tested a small box that beeped in teachers’ pockets every few minutes. The beep meant “look for a kid to praise.”
Three classrooms took part. The study used a multiple-baseline design across rooms. Teachers first tried to count their own praise. Then the beeps started.
What they found
The beeps tripled teacher praise within days. Praise stayed high as long as the box sounded. Self-recording alone had almost no effect.
Every teacher showed the same jump. No extra training was needed.
How this fits with other research
Rila et al. (2022) moved the idea forward fifty years. They swapped beeps for visual graphs and added equity checks. Both studies show feedback lifts praise, but Ashley’s work warns we must watch who gets the praise.
Aznar et al. (2005) also used feedback, not beeps, to boost teacher fidelity to full behavior plans. Their results line up: feedback works even when the target is broader than praise.
Lattal (2004) and Lambrechts et al. (2009) echo the same theme—feedback plus praise sharpens adult skills in clinics and simulators. The method travels across settings.
Why it matters
You can copy the 1975 setup tomorrow. Plug a free interval-timer app into a Bluetooth clip. Set it to vibrate every two minutes. Each buzz, scan the room and praise one student. The study shows you can hit three times your baseline rate by Friday with zero extra staff meetings.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Set a silent phone timer to buzz every 120 seconds; each buzz, deliver one labeled praise.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The effects of automated cueing on teacher praise rate was investigated in one special, one fourth-, and one seventh-grade classroom. After establishing baseline praise rates in each of the three classrooms, two methods for increasing teacher praise rate were introduced according to a multiple-baseline design. During the first phase, two teachers were instructed to count and graph their praise rate during each session. All teachers received auditory cues to prompt praising during another phase. In all cases, introduction of cues markedly increased teacher praise rates, but self-recording was relatively ineffective. An analysis of teacher-praise distributions showed that cues closely controlled teacher praise for two of the three teachers.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1975 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1975.8-197