Comparison of components of the Good Behavior Game in a preschool classroom
Use the whole Good Behavior Game first—then you can trim it back and still keep preschoolers calm.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Foley and team tested the Good Behavior Game in a preschool room. They asked: do we need every piece of the game to stop disruptions?
The kids played the game in different ways. Some days they got the full rules. Other days they got only part of the rules. The teachers watched which setup worked best.
What they found
Only the full Good Behavior Game cut disruptions. When parts were missing, problem behavior stayed high.
After the kids learned the full game, a simple rule kept the peace. The teachers still checked behavior, but they no longer gave points every time.
How this fits with other research
Thompson et al. (2023) also worked in preschool, but they used FCT instead of the Game. Both studies got zero aggression, showing two roads to calm rooms.
DeRoma et al. (2004) found teacher attention feeds problem acts. The Game turns that same attention into a prize for group good behavior.
Matson et al. (2011) list 40 ways to swap out bad behavior. The Game is one of those ways, just packaged for the whole class.
Why it matters
Run the full Good Behavior Game first. After kids know it, you can drop the fancy scoreboard and still keep control. This saves you time and keeps the room calm.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Teach the full Good Behavior Game this week; after three clean days, switch to a simple daily check-in and watch if disruptions stay low.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The Good Behavior Game (GBG) is an effective intervention package for decreasing disruptive behavior in various populations and environments. There is, however, limited research evaluating the GBG with preschoolers. Furthermore, few studies have evaluated the effects of components of the GBG, and of those that have, most have done so only after exposure to the GBG package. We evaluated the effects (a) of the GBG on disruptive behavior of preschoolers during group instruction and (b) the major components of the GBG before and after implementation of the GBG package (c) at both the group and individual level. Results suggest that the GBG package was necessary for decreasing disruptive behavior. However, after exposure to the GBG, a response-independent contingency was effective for maintaining low levels of disruptive behavior at both the group and individual level.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2019 · doi:10.1002/jaba.506